143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8922436)
1. Institutional Review Boards under stress: will they explode or change?
Phillips DF
JAMA; 1996 Nov; 276(20):1623-6. PubMed ID: 8922436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Research on humans faces scrutiny; new policies adopted.
Kefalides PT
Ann Intern Med; 2000 Mar; 132(6):513. PubMed ID: 10733462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Institutional review boards.
Levine RJ
BMJ; 1989 May; 298(6683):1268-9. PubMed ID: 2500193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Institutional Review Boards.
Brandt EN
JAMA; 1983 Jun; 249(21):2889-90. PubMed ID: 6842799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Foresight, insight, oversight.
White GB
Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(2):41-2. PubMed ID: 10321343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Private ethics boards and public debate.
Tauer CA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(2):43-5. PubMed ID: 10321344
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The institutional review board and beyond: future challenges to the ethics of human experimentation.
Edgar H; Rothman DJ
Milbank Q; 1995; 73(4):489-506. PubMed ID: 7491097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved protection for human research subjects.
Marwick C
JAMA; 1998 Feb; 279(5):344-5. PubMed ID: 9459454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Institutional review boards and medical devices.
Less JR; Alpert S; Nightingale SL
JAMA; 1994 Sep; 272(12):968-9. PubMed ID: 8084066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Institutional review boards. A net too thin.
Palca J
Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(3):4. PubMed ID: 8736666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. IRBs search for answers and support during a time of institutional change.
Phillips DF
JAMA; 2000 Feb; 283(6):729-30. PubMed ID: 10683041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. NIH guidelines for research involving recombinant DNA molecules.
Wilson DJ
Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):177-85. PubMed ID: 11652293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Institutional review of medical research. Cost-benefit analysis, risk-benefit analysis, and "the possible effects of research on public policy".
Schwartz RL
J Leg Med; 1983 Jun; 4(2):143-66. PubMed ID: 6411846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Institutional review boards and research on individuals with mental disorders.
Hoppe SK
Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):187-95. PubMed ID: 11654514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Beyond localism: a proposal for a National Research Review Board.
Levine C; Caplan AL
IRB; 1986; 8(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11649751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Institutional ethics committees. Legitimate and impartial review of ethical health care decisions.
Jaffe GA
J Leg Med; 1989 Sep; 10(3):393-431. PubMed ID: 2607217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. When OPRR (Office for Protection from Research Risks) comes calling: enforcing Federal research regulations.
McCarthy CR
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1995 Mar; 5(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 10141718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Commission says institutional review boards should change procedures now.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward a more comprehensive approach to protecting human subjects: the interface of data safety monitoring boards and institutional review boards in randomized clinical trials.
Gordon VM; Sugarman J; Kass N
IRB; 1998; 20(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11655324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. National commission proposes numerous new regulations of institutional review boards.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
