These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8922454)
1. US medical researchers, the Nuremberg Doctors Trial, and the Nuremberg Code. A review of findings of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. Faden RR; Lederer SE; Moreno JD JAMA; 1996 Nov; 276(20):1667-71. PubMed ID: 8922454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Nuremberg Code and the Nuremberg Trial. A reappraisal. Katz J JAMA; 1996 Nov; 276(20):1662-6. PubMed ID: 8922453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nuremberg and the issue of wartime experiments on US prisoners. The Green Committee. Harkness JM JAMA; 1996 Nov; 276(20):1672-5. PubMed ID: 8922455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fifty years later: the significance of the Nuremberg Code. Shuster E N Engl J Med; 1997 Nov; 337(20):1436-40. PubMed ID: 9358142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reassessing the influence of the Nuremberg Code on American medical ethics. Moreno JD J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1997; 13(2):347-60. PubMed ID: 9212522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Vulnerable persons in biomedical research: 50 years after the Nuremberg Code. Dickens BM J Int Bioethique; 1999; 10(1-2):13-23. PubMed ID: 11806429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Nuremberg Code: Hippocratic ethics and human rights. Shuster E Lancet; 1998 Mar; 351(9107):974-7. PubMed ID: 9734958 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Research ethics and the medical profession. Report of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. JAMA; 1996 Aug; 276(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 8683820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Negotiating international bioethics: a response to Tom Beauchamp and Ruth Macklin. Baker R Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1998 Dec; 8(4):423-53. PubMed ID: 11657321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fifty years of the Nuremberg Code: a time for retrospection and introspection. Faraone SV; Gottesman II; Tsuang MT Am J Med Genet; 1997 Jul; 74(4):345-7. PubMed ID: 9259366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Human guinea pigs and the ethics of experimentation: the BMJ's correspondent at the Nuremberg medical trial. Weindling P BMJ; 1996 Dec; 313(7070):1467-70. PubMed ID: 8973237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. "The only feasible means." The Pentagon's ambivalent relationship with the Nuremberg Code. Moreno JD Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(5):11-9. PubMed ID: 8891703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nuremberg lamentation: for the forgotten victims of medical science. Seidelman WE BMJ; 1996 Dec; 313(7070):1463-7. PubMed ID: 8973236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reflections on the 50th anniversary of the Nuremberg doctors' trials. Diamond EF Linacre Q; 1997 May; 64(2):17-20. PubMed ID: 11654998 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. War crimes and medical science. Leaning J BMJ; 1996 Dec; 313(7070):1413-5. PubMed ID: 8973217 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Informed consent in human experimentation before the Nuremberg code. Vollmann J; Winau R BMJ; 1996 Dec; 313(7070):1445-9. PubMed ID: 8973233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Medicine and conscience: the debate on medical ethics and research in Germany 50 years after Nuremberg. Wunder M Perspect Biol Med; 2000; 43(3):373-81. PubMed ID: 10893726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]