These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8922694)

  • 1. The test-retest variability of the caloric test: a comparison of a modified air irrigation with the conventional water technique.
    Munro KJ; Higson JM
    Br J Audiol; 1996 Oct; 30(5):303-6. PubMed ID: 8922694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of test-retest variability of caloric induced nystagmus in a normal population using an air stimulus presented via a standard and modified irrigating probe.
    Moon J; Munro KJ
    Br J Audiol; 1996 Jun; 30(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 8818249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Test-retest reliability of open-loop bithermal caloric irrigation responses from healthy young adults.
    Henry DF
    Am J Otol; 1999 Mar; 20(2):220-2. PubMed ID: 10100526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Caloric irrigators: air, open-loop water and closed-loop water.
    Anderson S
    Br J Audiol; 1995 Apr; 29(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 8589656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A comparison of water and air stimulated bithermal-caloric test and the usefulness of both methods in otologic surgery].
    Rydzewski B
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2002; 56(2):231-4. PubMed ID: 12094651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The air caloric test. A parametric study.
    Coats AC; Hebert F; Atwood GR
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1976 Jun; 102(6):343-54. PubMed ID: 1275802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Water irrigation versus air insufflation: a comparison of two caloric test protocols.
    Maes L; Dhooge I; De Vel E; D'haenens W; Bockstael A; Vinck BM
    Int J Audiol; 2007 May; 46(5):263-9. PubMed ID: 17487674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitivity evaluation in air and water caloric stimulation of the vestibular organs using videonystagmography.
    Jałocha-Kaczka A; Pietkiewicz P; Zielińska-Bliźniewska H; Miłoński J; Olszewski J
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2014; 68(5):227-32. PubMed ID: 25283318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Air caloric test: as useful as the water caloric test (author's transl)].
    Zangemeister WH; Bock O
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1979 Apr; 58(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 439998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of responses to air, water, and closed-loop caloric irrigators.
    Karlsen EA; Mikhail HH; Norris CW; Hassanein RS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Feb; 35(1):186-91. PubMed ID: 1735967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Air versus water caloric test.
    Zangemeister WH; Bock O
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1980 Dec; 5(6):379-87. PubMed ID: 6970635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Balancing the caloric-induced nystagmus velocity with cold air and water.
    Munro KJ; Bonnington CL
    Br J Audiol; 1998 Oct; 32(5):301-4. PubMed ID: 9845028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The effect of caloric test sequence on maximum slow-phase velocity].
    Wen Y; Zhang L; Ge P
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Apr; 18(4):212-4. PubMed ID: 15318634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Air as the caloric stimulus.
    O'Neill GO
    Br J Audiol; 1978 May; 12(2):54-8. PubMed ID: 667396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of water and air caloric responses and their ability to distinguish between patients with normal and impaired ears.
    Zapala DA; Olsholt KF; Lundy LB
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):585-600. PubMed ID: 18600135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Closed-loop caloric, harmonic acceleration and active head rotation tests: norms and reliability.
    Henry DF; DiBartolomeo JD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1993 Dec; 109(6):975-87. PubMed ID: 8265197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluation of the furosemide test using the air caloric stimulator].
    Hata Y; Fukaya T
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1995 Jun; 98(6):931-6. PubMed ID: 7629645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wet air as an alternative to traditional water irrigation during caloric vestibular testing.
    Gudziol H; Koch C; Bitter T; Guntinas-Lichius O
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Mar; 122(3):703-7. PubMed ID: 22253042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A protocol for the air caloric test and a comparison with a standard water caloric test.
    Tole JR
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1979 Jun; 105(6):314-9. PubMed ID: 454282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A comparison between the "bithermal caloric test" and the "hot monothermal with simultaneous cold test"].
    Vannucchi P; Pagnini P; Santoro R
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1993; 13(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 8304039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.