These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8922992)

  • 1. Auditory enhancement at the absolute threshold of hearing and its relationship to the Zwicker tone.
    Wiegrebe L; Kössl M; Schmidt S
    Hear Res; 1996 Oct; 100(1-2):171-80. PubMed ID: 8922992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neurophysiological correlate of the auditory after-image ('Zwicker tone').
    Hoke ES; Hoke M; Ross B
    Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(3):161-74. PubMed ID: 9390799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modulation of auditory percepts by transcutaneous electrical stimulation.
    Ueberfuhr MA; Braun A; Wiegrebe L; Grothe B; Drexl M
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():235-243. PubMed ID: 28323018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The intensitive DL of tones: dependence of signal/masker ratio on tone level and on spectrum of added noise.
    Greenwood DD
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):1-39. PubMed ID: 8458743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Zwicker tone illusion and noise reduction in the auditory system.
    Franosch JM; Kempter R; Fastl H; van Hemmen JL
    Phys Rev Lett; 2003 May; 90(17):178103. PubMed ID: 12786108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency selectivity of the human cochlea: Suppression tuning of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    Manley GA; van Dijk P
    Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():53-62. PubMed ID: 27139323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of occupational noise on pure-tone threshold and distortion product otoacoustic emissions after one workday.
    Müller J; Janssen T
    Hear Res; 2008 Dec; 246(1-2):9-22. PubMed ID: 18848612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitive response to low-frequency cochlear distortion products in the auditory midbrain.
    Abel C; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 101(3):1560-74. PubMed ID: 19036870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal over-exposure: time course of recovery and effects of lowering L2.
    Sutton LA; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK; Whitehead ML
    Hear Res; 1994 May; 75(1-2):161-74. PubMed ID: 8071143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. I. Enhancement of compound action potentials to masked tones.
    Kawase T; Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2519-32. PubMed ID: 8120596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones.
    Kawase T; Delgutte B; Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2533-49. PubMed ID: 8120597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of disappearing and reappearing spontaneous otoacoustic emissions on one subject's threshold microstructure.
    Smurzynski J; Probst R
    Hear Res; 1998 Jan; 115(1-2):197-205. PubMed ID: 9472748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in otoacoustic emissions and high-frequency hearing thresholds in children and adolescents.
    Groh D; Pelanova J; Jilek M; Popelar J; Kabelka Z; Syka J
    Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 212(1-2):90-8. PubMed ID: 16364580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adults, but not children, benefit from a pretrial signal cue in a random-frequency, two-tone masker.
    Bonino AY; Leibold LJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):EL8-13. PubMed ID: 26233066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relative role of beats and combination tones in determining the shapes of masking patterns: II. Hearing-impaired listeners.
    Alcántara JI; Moore BC
    Hear Res; 2002 Mar; 165(1-2):103-16. PubMed ID: 12031520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigating possible mechanisms behind the effect of threshold fine structure on amplitude modulation perception.
    Heise SJ; Mauermann M; Verhey JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2490-500. PubMed ID: 19894829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acoustic echoplanar scanner noise and pure tone hearing thresholds: the effects of sequence repetition times and acoustic noise rates.
    Ulmer JL; Biswal BB; Mark LP; Mathews VP; Prost RW; Millen SJ; Garman JN; Horzewski D
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(3):480-6. PubMed ID: 9606392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.
    Brass D; Kemp DT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Feb; 93(2):920-39. PubMed ID: 8445127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pure-tone threshold estimation from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission I/O-functions in normal and cochlear hearing loss ears.
    Boege P; Janssen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Apr; 111(4):1810-8. PubMed ID: 12002865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.