These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8923164)

  • 1. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: inter-machine variability.
    Tataranni PA; Pettitt DJ; Ravussin E
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1996 Nov; 20(11):1048-50. PubMed ID: 8923164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproducibility of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry total and regional body composition measurements using different scanning positions and definitions of regions.
    Lohman M; Tallroth K; Kettunen JA; Marttinen MT
    Metabolism; 2009 Nov; 58(11):1663-8. PubMed ID: 19632696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The intra- and inter-instrument reliability of DXA based on ex vivo soft tissue measurements.
    Guo Y; Franks PW; Brookshire T; Antonio Tataranni P
    Obes Res; 2004 Dec; 12(12):1925-9. PubMed ID: 15687392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry machines for measuring fat distribution changes of HIV-associated lipodystrophy.
    Yang Y; Zhu WD; Paton NI
    Antivir Ther; 2004 Oct; 9(5):771-8. PubMed ID: 15535415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of human body composition using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis.
    Bolanowski M; Nilsson BE
    Med Sci Monit; 2001; 7(5):1029-33. PubMed ID: 11535954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of in-vivo body composition using two Lunar dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers.
    Oldroyd B; Truscott JG; Woodrow G; Milner R; Stewart SP; Smith AH; Westmacott CF; Smith MA
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1998 Mar; 52(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 9537303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of a new body composition phantom for quality control and cross-calibration of DXA devices.
    Diessel E; Fuerst T; Njeh CF; Tylavsky F; Cauley J; Dockrell M; Genant HK
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2000 Aug; 89(2):599-605. PubMed ID: 10926643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Body composition assessment: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) compared to reference methods.
    Van Loan MD; Mayclin PL
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1992 Feb; 46(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 1559514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Total bone mineral content and body composition by x-ray densitometry in newborns.
    Venkataraman PS; Ahluwalia BW
    Pediatrics; 1992 Nov; 90(5):767-70. PubMed ID: 1408552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of air-displacement plethysmography for estimation of body fat mass in healthy elderly subjects.
    Bosy-Westphal A; Mast M; Eichhorn C; Becker C; Kutzner D; Heller M; Müller MJ
    Eur J Nutr; 2003 Aug; 42(4):207-16. PubMed ID: 12923652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in whole body measurements by DXA-scanning using two Lunar DPX-L machines.
    Lantz H; Samuelson G; Bratteby LE; Mallmin H; Sjöström L
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1999 Jul; 23(7):764-70. PubMed ID: 10454112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of two software versions for assessment of body-composition analysis by DXA.
    Vozarova B; Wang J; Weyer C; Tataranni PA
    Obes Res; 2001 Mar; 9(3):229-32. PubMed ID: 11323450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of body composition by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).
    Haarbo J; Gotfredsen A; Hassager C; Christiansen C
    Clin Physiol; 1991 Jul; 11(4):331-41. PubMed ID: 1914437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of dual-photon absorptiometry systems for total-body bone and soft tissue measurements: dual-energy X-rays versus gadolinium 153.
    Russell-Aulet M; Wang J; Thornton J; Pierson RN
    J Bone Miner Res; 1991 Apr; 6(4):411-5. PubMed ID: 1858524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparisons between Hologic, Lunar and Norland dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers and other techniques used for whole-body soft tissue measurements.
    Tothill P; Avenell A; Love J; Reid DM
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1994 Nov; 48(11):781-94. PubMed ID: 7859696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of hydration status on body composition as measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in normal volunteers and patients on haemodialysis.
    Horber FF; Thomi F; Casez JP; Fonteille J; Jaeger P
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Oct; 65(778):895-900. PubMed ID: 1422663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pencil-beam vs fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry comparisons across four systems: body composition and bone mineral.
    Soriano JM; Ioannidou E; Wang J; Thornton JC; Horlick MN; Gallagher D; Heymsfield SB; Pierson RN
    J Clin Densitom; 2004; 7(3):281-9. PubMed ID: 15319498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) by comparison with chemical analysis of dogs and cats.
    Speakman JR; Booles D; Butterwick R
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Mar; 25(3):439-47. PubMed ID: 11319644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of tissue depth and composition on the performance of the Lunar dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer whole-body scanning mode.
    Laskey MA; Lyttle KD; Flaxman ME; Barber RW
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1992 Jan; 46(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 1559506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of body composition by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and two different software packages.
    Van Loan MD; Keim NL; Berg K; Mayclin PL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1995 Apr; 27(4):587-91. PubMed ID: 7791591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.