These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8923690)
1. Perspectives on pathology peer review. Long G Toxicol Pathol; 1996; 24(5):645-6. PubMed ID: 8923690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Pathology peer review from the perspective of an external peer review pathologist. Mann PC Toxicol Pathol; 1996; 24(5):650-3. PubMed ID: 8923692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Regulatory forum opinion piece*: pathology peer review--dilemmas of documentation. Kerlin RL; Schafer KA Toxicol Pathol; 2013; 41(7):1049-50. PubMed ID: 23960162 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Regulatory forum opinion piece*: pathology peer review--to lock or not to lock, is that really the question? Engelhardt JA; Hardisty JF; Mann PC Toxicol Pathol; 2013; 41(7):1051-2. PubMed ID: 23960166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A commentary on the process of peer review and pathology data locking. McKay JS; Barale-Thomas E; Bolon B; George C; Hardisty J; Manabe S; Schorsch F; Teranishi M; Weber K Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2011 Jan; 63(1-2):197-8. PubMed ID: 20727724 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Peer review in toxicologic pathology: some recommendations. The Society of Toxicologic Pathologists. Toxicol Pathol; 1991; 19(3):290-2. PubMed ID: 1780645 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Society of Toxicologic Pathology position on histopathology data collection and audit trail: compliance with 21 CFR parts 58 and 11. Tuomari D; Elliott G; Kulwich B; Yarrington J; Fouillet X; Geoly F; Long P Toxicol Pathol; 2004; 32(1):122-3. PubMed ID: 14713556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recommendations for pathology peer review. Morton D; Sellers RS; Barale-Thomas E; Bolon B; George C; Hardisty JF; Irizarry A; McKay JS; Odin M; Teranishi M Toxicol Pathol; 2010 Dec; 38(7):1118-27. PubMed ID: 20924082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Regulatory forum opinion piece: Peer review documentation and pathology data locking. Neef N Toxicol Pathol; 2014; 42(2):311-3. PubMed ID: 24357644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A commentary on the process of peer review and pathology data locking. McKay JS; Barale-Thomas E; Bolon B; George C; Hardisty J; Manabe S; Schorsch F; Teranishi M; Weber K Toxicol Pathol; 2010 Apr; 38(3):508-10. PubMed ID: 20237370 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of the study pathologist. Weber K Toxicol Pathol; 2014 Jan; 42(1):276-7. PubMed ID: 24334675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Society of Toxicologic Pathology position paper on pathology image data: compliance with 21 CFR Parts 58 and 11. Tuomari DL; Kemp RK; Sellers R; Yarrington JT; Geoly FJ; Fouillet XL; Dybdal N; Perry R; Toxicol Pathol; 2007 Apr; 35(3):450-5. PubMed ID: 17474067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Peer review procedures in pathology - more than ten years of experience in the free state of Saxony]. Eberlein-Gonska M; Baretton G; Habeck JO Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(8):571-8. PubMed ID: 23084863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]