121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8923753)
1. A gender difference in visual-spatial ability in 4-year-old children: effects on performance of a kinesthetic acuity task.
Livesey DJ; Intili D
J Exp Child Psychol; 1996 Nov; 63(2):436-46. PubMed ID: 8923753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of visual impairment on measures of cognitive function for children with congenital toxoplasmosis: implications for compensatory intervention strategies.
Roizen N; Kasza K; Karrison T; Mets M; Noble AG; Boyer K; Swisher C; Meier P; Remington J; Jalbrzikowski J; McLeod R; Kipp M; Rabiah P; Chamot D; Estes R; Cezar S; Mack D; Pfiffner L; Stein M; Danis B; Patel D; Hopkins J; Holfels E; Stein L; Withers S; Cameron A; Perkins J; Heydemann P
Pediatrics; 2006 Aug; 118(2):e379-90. PubMed ID: 16864640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of forward models for hand localization and movement control in 6- to 10-year-old children.
Contreras-Vidal JL
Hum Mov Sci; 2006 Oct; 25(4-5):634-45. PubMed ID: 17011659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hands up: attentional prioritization of space near the hand.
Reed CL; Grubb JD; Steele C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):166-77. PubMed ID: 16478334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differential cue utilization by males and females in pattern copying.
Vasta R; Green PJ
Child Dev; 1982 Aug; 53(4):1102-5. PubMed ID: 7128256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of spatial cues on preschoolers' selective attention.
Blumberg FC; Torenberg M
J Genet Psychol; 2003 Mar; 164(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 12693743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vision and touch in ageing: crossmodal selective attention and visuotactile spatial interactions.
Poliakoff E; Ashworth S; Lowe C; Spence C
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):507-17. PubMed ID: 16098997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multisensory cues capture spatial attention regardless of perceptual load.
Santangelo V; Spence C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1311-21. PubMed ID: 18085945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of self-motion on attention in real 3D space.
Kimura T; Miura T; Doi S; Yamamoto Y
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jul; 131(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 19524213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of arm weight on C-not-B task performance: implications for the motor inhibitory deficit account of search failures.
Rivière J; Lécuyer R
J Exp Child Psychol; 2008 May; 100(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 18313688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mental rotation at 7 years: relations with prenatal testosterone levels and spatial play experiences.
Grimshaw GM; Sitarenios G; Finegan JA
Brain Cogn; 1995 Oct; 29(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 8845125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Age differences in the relationship between visual movement imagery and performance on kinesthetic acuity tests.
Livesey DJ
Dev Psychol; 2002 Mar; 38(2):279-87. PubMed ID: 11881762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The line copy task for kinesthesia and internal movement representation: application in children.
Smits-Engelsman B; Duysens J
Hum Mov Sci; 2008 Oct; 27(5):682-94. PubMed ID: 18513816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Spatial representation of a two-dimensional pattern].
Denis S; Boucher JL
Can J Psychol; 1991 Sep; 45(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 1933675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Allocentric visual cues influence online limb adjustments.
Heath M; Neely K; Binsted G
Motor Control; 2007 Jan; 11(1):54-70. PubMed ID: 17392567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of sleep reduction on spatial attention.
Versace F; Cavallero C; De Min Tona G; Mozzato M; Stegagno L
Biol Psychol; 2006 Mar; 71(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 15978717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Children's use of geometric information in mapping tasks.
Vasilyeva M; Bowers E
J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Dec; 95(4):255-77. PubMed ID: 16777136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dissociation between "where" and "how" judgements of one's own motor performance in a video-controlled reaching task.
Boy F; Palluel-Germain R; Orliaguet JP; Coello Y
Neurosci Lett; 2005 Sep; 386(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 15982810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Thinking outside the body: an advantage for spatial updating during imagined versus physical self-rotation.
Wraga M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):993-1005. PubMed ID: 14516230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spatial performance of unilateral vestibular defective patients in nonvisual versus visual navigation.
Péruch P; Borel L; Gaunet F; Thinus-Blanc G; Magnan J; Lacour M
J Vestib Res; 1999; 9(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 10334015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
