These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [Influence of typical size of objects in a categorization task]. Ferrier L; Staudt A; Reilhac G; Jiménez M; Brouillet D Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):316-21. PubMed ID: 18266507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The length of the retention interval, forgetting, and subjective similarity. King DL; Jones FL; Pearlman RC; Tishman A; Felix CA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):660-71. PubMed ID: 12109760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Size and orientation of objects in explicit and implicit memory: a reversal of the dissociation between perceptual similarity and type of test. Zimmer HD Psychol Res; 1995; 57(3-4):260-73. PubMed ID: 7753956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Objects and attributes in divided attention: surface and boundary systems. Duncan J; Nimmo-Smith I Percept Psychophys; 1996 Oct; 58(7):1076-84. PubMed ID: 8920843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Where similarity beats redundancy: the importance of context, higher order similarity, and response assignment. Eidels A; Townsend JT; Pomerantz JR J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1441-63. PubMed ID: 19045985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Size and reflection effects in priming: a test of transfer-appropriate processing. Srinivas K Mem Cognit; 1996 Jul; 24(4):441-52. PubMed ID: 8757493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inhibition of return for target discriminations: the effect of repeating discriminated and irrelevant stimulus dimensions. Taylor TL; Donnelly MP Percept Psychophys; 2002 Feb; 64(2):292-317. PubMed ID: 12013382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Weber fraction versus perceived similarity. King DL; Henry GE; Shanks SC Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Dec; 89(3 Pt 1):903-14. PubMed ID: 10665024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Local and global factors of similarity in visual search. von Grünau M; Dubé S; Galera C Percept Psychophys; 1994 May; 55(5):575-92. PubMed ID: 8008558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Practice makes it better: A psychophysical study of visual perceptual learning and its transfer effects on aging. Li X; Allen PA; Lien MC; Yamamoto N Psychol Aging; 2017 Feb; 32(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 27991807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Size congruity effects with two-digit numbers: expanding the number line? Fitousi D; Algom D Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):445-57. PubMed ID: 16752607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. One line decreases the visibility of a simultaneous identical distant second line. King DL; Mose JF; Nixon NS Percept Psychophys; 1995 Apr; 57(3):393-401. PubMed ID: 7770329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adventitious control by the location of comparison stimuli in conditional discriminations. Sidman M J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Jul; 58(1):173-82. PubMed ID: 1645099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Action-induced effects on perception depend neither on element-level nor on set-level similarity between stimulus and response sets. Wykowska A; Hommel B; Schubö A Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1034-41. PubMed ID: 21472508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The mean-integral representation of rectangles. Macmillan NA; Ornstein AS Percept Psychophys; 1998 Feb; 60(2):250-62. PubMed ID: 9529909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transfer across delayed discriminations: evidence regarding the nature of prospective working memory. Urcuioli PJ; Zentall TR J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Apr; 18(2):154-73. PubMed ID: 1583445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perceptual asymmetries are preserved in short-term memory tasks. Montaser-Kouhsari L; Carrasco M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1782-92. PubMed ID: 19933562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]