These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8923988)

  • 1. Experimental analysis of fluid mechanical energy losses in aortic valve stenosis: importance of pressure recovery.
    Heinrich RS; Fontaine AA; Grimes RY; Sidhaye A; Yang S; Moore KE; Levine RA; Yoganathan AP
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1996; 24(6):685-94. PubMed ID: 8923988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The hemodynamic effects of mechanical prosthetic valve type and orientation on fluid mechanical energy loss and pressure drop in in vitro models of ventricular hypertrophy.
    Travis BR; Heinrich RS; Ensley AE; Gibson DE; Hashim S; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 9651851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of small-diameter aortic mechanical prostheses: physiological relevance of the Doppler gradient, utility of flow augmentation, and limitations of orifice area estimation.
    Marcus RH; Heinrich RS; Bednarz J; Lupovitch S; Abruzzo J; Borok R; Vandenberg B; Kerber RE; Piccione W; Yoganathan AP; Lang RM
    Circulation; 1998 Sep; 98(9):866-72. PubMed ID: 9738641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of mechanical aortic valve orientation on coronary artery flow: comparison of tilting disc versus bileaflet prostheses in pigs.
    Kleine P; Scherer M; Abdel-Rahman U; Klesius AA; Ackermann H; Moritz A
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Nov; 124(5):925-32. PubMed ID: 12407375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of valvular resistance, stroke work loss, and Gorlin valve area for quantification of aortic stenosis. An in vitro study in a pulsatile aortic flow model.
    Voelker W; Reul H; Nienhaus G; Stelzer T; Schmitz B; Steegers A; Karsch KR
    Circulation; 1995 Feb; 91(4):1196-204. PubMed ID: 7850959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ventricular stroke work loss: validation of a method of quantifying the severity of aortic stenosis and derivation of an orifice formula.
    Sprigings DC; Chambers JB; Cochrane T; Allen J; Jackson G
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1990 Dec; 16(7):1608-14. PubMed ID: 2254546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fluid-structure interaction modeling of aortic valve stenosis at different heart rates.
    Bahraseman HG; Languri EM; Yahyapourjalaly N; Espino DM
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2016; 18(3):11-20. PubMed ID: 27840438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Valve orifice area alone is an insufficient index of aortic stenosis severity: effects of the proximal and distal geometry on transaortic energy loss.
    Heinrich RS; Marcus RH; Ensley AE; Gibson DE; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Sep; 8(5):509-15. PubMed ID: 10517392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Different tilting disc valves show similar rotation-dependent impairment in hemodynamic performance under a tilted implantation position.
    Hartrumpf M; Kuehnel RU; Puchner R; Wendt MO; Pohl M; Albes JM
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 53(5):274-80. PubMed ID: 16208612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of effective orifice area of prosthetic aortic valves with Doppler echocardiography: an in vivo and in vitro study.
    Bech-Hanssen O; Caidahl K; Wallentin I; Ask P; Wranne B
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Aug; 122(2):287-95. PubMed ID: 11479501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pressure recovery in aortic stenosis: an in vitro study in a pulsatile flow model.
    Voelker W; Reul H; Stelzer T; Schmidt A; Karsch KR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Dec; 20(7):1585-93. PubMed ID: 1452933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Doppler assessment of prosthetic valve orifice area. An in vitro study.
    Baumgartner H; Khan SS; DeRobertis M; Czer LS; Maurer G
    Circulation; 1992 Jun; 85(6):2275-83. PubMed ID: 1591841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hemodynamic function of the standard St. Jude bileaflet disc valve has no clinical impact 10 years after aortic valve replacement.
    Lund O; Dørup I; Emmertsen K; Jensen FT; Flø C
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2005 Sep; 39(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 16118072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel pulse duplicator system: evaluation of different valve prostheses.
    Haaf P; Steiner M; Attmann T; Pfister G; Cremer J; Lutter G
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Feb; 57(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 19169990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physiological basis of flow dependence of Gorlin formula valve area in aortic stenosis: analysis using an hydraulic model of pulsatile flow.
    Rifkin RD
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Nov; 9(6):740-51. PubMed ID: 11128779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of heart rate on the hemodynamics of bileaflet mechanical heart valves' prostheses (St. Jude Medical) in the aortic position and in the opening phase: A computational study.
    Jahandardoost M; Fradet G; Mohammadi H
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Mar; 230(3):175-90. PubMed ID: 26786673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improvement in left intraventricular pressure gradients after aortic valve replacement in aortic stenosis patients.
    Guerra M; Mendes-Ferreira P; Adão R; Pereira E; Vieira M; Lourenço AP; Brás-Silva C; Bastos P; Vouga L; Leite-Moreira AF
    Exp Physiol; 2017 Apr; 102(4):411-421. PubMed ID: 28194824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic hemodynamic energy loss in normal and stenosed aortic valves.
    Yap CH; Dasi LP; Yoganathan AP
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Feb; 132(2):021005. PubMed ID: 20370242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The hemodynamic performance of standard bileaflet valves is impaired by a tilted implantation position.
    Hartrumpf M; Albes JM; Krempl T; Rudolph V; Wahlers T
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2003 Mar; 23(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 12614795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tilting disc versus bileaflet aortic valve substitutes: intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic performance in humans.
    Kleine P; Hasenkam MJ; Nygaard H; Perthel M; Wesemeyer D; Laas J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Mar; 9(2):308-11; discussion 311-2. PubMed ID: 10772054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.