These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8923988)

  • 21. A hemodynamic comparison of Omniscience and Medtronic Hall aortic prostheses.
    Plehn JF; Arbuckle BE; Southworth J; Nugent W; Plume S; Marrin CA
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 May; 5(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 8793686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In vitro comparison of bileaflet aortic heart valve prostheses. St. Jude Medical, CarboMedics, modified Edwards-Duromedics, and Sorin-Bicarbon valves.
    Reul H; van Son JA; Steinseifer U; Schmitz B; Schmidt A; Schmitz C; Rau G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Sep; 106(3):412-20. PubMed ID: 8361181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In vitro comparison of aortic heart valve prostheses. Part 1: Mechanical valves.
    Knott E; Reul H; Knoch M; Steinseifer U; Rau G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Dec; 96(6):952-61. PubMed ID: 3193804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Orientation of tilting disc and bileaflet aortic valve substitutes for optimal hemodynamics.
    Laas J; Kleine P; Hasenkam MJ; Nygaard H
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1999 Sep; 68(3):1096-9. PubMed ID: 10510028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Analysis of regurgitation, mean systolic pressure drop and energy losses for two artificial aortic valves.
    Sakhaeimanesh AA; Morsi YS
    J Med Eng Technol; 1999; 23(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 10356676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Flow characteristics of four commonly used mechanical heart valves.
    Rashtian MY; Stevenson DM; Allen DT; Yoganathan AP; Harrison EC; Edmiston WA; Faughan P; Rahimtoola SH
    Am J Cardiol; 1986 Oct; 58(9):743-52. PubMed ID: 3766415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hemodynamic and volume correlates of left ventricular diastolic relaxation and filling in patients with aortic stenosis.
    Vanoverschelde JL; Essamri B; Michel X; Hanet C; Cosyns JR; Detry JM; Wijns W
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Oct; 20(4):813-21. PubMed ID: 1388182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of varying degrees of stenosis on the characteristics of turbulent pulsatile flow through heart valves.
    Bluestein D; Einav S
    J Biomech; 1995 Aug; 28(8):915-24. PubMed ID: 7673259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. What do you mean by aortic valve area: geometric orifice area, effective orifice area, or gorlin area?
    Garcia D; Kadem L
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Sep; 15(5):601-8. PubMed ID: 17044363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Modified gorlin equation for the diagnosis of mixed aortic valve pathology.
    Scotten LN; Walker DK; Dutton JW
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 May; 11(3):360-8; discussion 368. PubMed ID: 12056728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vitro pressure drop comparison between two mechanical valve prostheses.
    Kim SH; Chang BC; Cho BK
    Yonsei Med J; 1994 Mar; 35(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 8009899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modeling of the Instantaneous Transvalvular Pressure Gradient in Aortic Stenosis.
    Hatoum H; Mo XM; Crestanello JA; Dasi LP
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2019 Aug; 47(8):1748-1763. PubMed ID: 31037445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Aortic valve replacement reduces valvuloarterial impedance but does not affect systemic arterial compliance in elderly men with degenerative calcific trileaflet aortic valve stenosis.
    Pagel PS; Schroeder AR; De Vry DJ; Hudetz JA
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1540-4. PubMed ID: 25267695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of hinge microflow fields of bileaflet mechanical heart valves implanted in different sinus shape and downstream geometry.
    Kuan YH; Kabinejadian F; Nguyen VT; Su B; Yoganathan AP; Leo HL
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2015; 18(16):1785-96. PubMed ID: 25343223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of three-dimensional valve shape on the hemodynamics of aortic stenosis: three-dimensional echocardiographic stereolithography and patient studies.
    Gilon D; Cape EG; Handschumacher MD; Song JK; Solheim J; VanAuker M; King ME; Levine RA
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2002 Oct; 40(8):1479-86. PubMed ID: 12392840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of valve resistance with effective orifice area regarding flow dependence.
    Blais C; Pibarot P; Dumesnil JG; Garcia D; Chen D; Durand LG
    Am J Cardiol; 2001 Jul; 88(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 11423057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A method for the measurement of left ventricular overload for combined aortic valve pathology.
    Travis BR; Fowler BL; Robicsek F
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2009 Sep; 18(5):499-506. PubMed ID: 20099690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fluid dynamics of the CarboMedics kinetic bileaflet prosthetic heart valve.
    Baldwin JT; Campbell A; Luck C; Ogilvie W; Sauter J
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1997 Feb; 11(2):287-92. PubMed ID: 9080157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Experimental analysis of pulsatile flow characteristics in prosthetic aortic valve models with stenosis.
    Zhang R; Zhang Y
    Med Eng Phys; 2020 May; 79():10-18. PubMed ID: 32205024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Coronary perfusion: impact of flow dynamics and geometric design of 2 different aortic prostheses of similar size.
    Mannacio V; Di Tommaso L; De Amicis V; Stassano P; Vosa C
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 May; 143(5):1030-5. PubMed ID: 21752400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.