These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8924226)

  • 1. Mechanical reliability of AMS hydraulic penile prostheses.
    Kim SC
    J Korean Med Sci; 1995 Dec; 10(6):422-5. PubMed ID: 8924226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term mechanical reliability of AMS 700 series inflatable penile prostheses: comparison of CX/CXM and Ultrex cylinders.
    Daitch JA; Angermeier KW; Lakin MM; Ingleright BJ; Montague DK
    J Urol; 1997 Oct; 158(4):1400-2. PubMed ID: 9302130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. AMS 700CX/CXM inflatable penile prosthesis has high mechanical reliability at long-term follow-up.
    Kim DS; Yang KM; Chung HJ; Choi HM; Choi YD; Choi HK
    J Sex Med; 2010 Jul; 7(7):2602-7. PubMed ID: 20384938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term results with Hydroflex and Dynaflex penile prostheses: device survival comparison to multicomponent inflatables.
    Wilson SK; Cleves M; Delk JR
    J Urol; 1996 May; 155(5):1621-3. PubMed ID: 8627837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term mechanical reliability of AMS 700CX/CXM inflatable penile prosthesis.
    Dhar NB; Angermeier KW; Montague DK
    J Urol; 2006 Dec; 176(6 Pt 1):2599-601; discussion 2601. PubMed ID: 17085168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ten years of experience with various penile prosthesis in Korean.
    Choi HK; Cho IR; Xin ZC
    Yonsei Med J; 1994 Jun; 35(2):209-17. PubMed ID: 8091798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanical reliability of the AMS 700CXM inflatable penile prosthesis for the treatment of male erectile dysfunction.
    Deuk Choi Y; Jin Choi Y; Hwan Kim J; Ki Choi H
    J Urol; 2001 Mar; 165(3):822-4. PubMed ID: 11176478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term mechanical reliability of multicomponent inflatable penile prosthesis: comparison of device survival.
    Dubocq F; Tefilli MV; Gheiler EL; Li H; Dhabuwala CB
    Urology; 1998 Aug; 52(2):277-81. PubMed ID: 9697794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction outcomes of the AMS 700CX inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a long-term multicenter study. AMS 700CX Study Group.
    Carson CC; Mulcahy JJ; Govier FE
    J Urol; 2000 Aug; 164(2):376-80. PubMed ID: 10893589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture at the input tube-cylinder junction of AMS 700 inflatable penile prostheses as a complication of a modified implantation technique in a series of 99 patients.
    Kim SC; Seo KK; Yoon SH
    Urology; 1999 Jul; 54(1):148-51. PubMed ID: 10414743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term followup of and patient satisfaction with the Dynaflex self-contained inflatable penile prosthesis.
    Kabalin JN; Kuo JC
    J Urol; 1997 Aug; 158(2):456-9. PubMed ID: 9224322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intermediate term assessment of the reliability, function and patient satisfaction with the AMS700 Ultrex penile prosthesis.
    Holloway FB; Farah RN
    J Urol; 1997 May; 157(5):1687-91. PubMed ID: 9112506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term followup of treatment for Peyronie's disease: modeling the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesis.
    Wilson SK; Cleves MA; Delk JR
    J Urol; 2001 Mar; 165(3):825-9. PubMed ID: 11176479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative revision rates of inflatable penile prostheses using woven Dacron® fabric cylinders.
    Enemchukwu EA; Kaufman MR; Whittam BM; Milam DF
    J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2189-93. PubMed ID: 23845458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraluminal device pressures in 3-piece inflatable penile prostheses: the "pathophysiology" of mechanical malfunction.
    Pescatori ES; Goldstein I
    J Urol; 1993 Feb; 149(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 8426405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical failure of the American Medical Systems Ultrex inflatable penile prosthesis: before and after 1993 structural modification.
    Milbank AJ; Montague DK; Angermeier KW; Lakin MM; Worley SE
    J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2502-6. PubMed ID: 11992067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. AMS 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation in men with Peyronie's disease: comparison of CX and Ultrex cylinders.
    Montague DK; Angermeier KW; Lakin MM; Ingleright BJ
    J Urol; 1996 Nov; 156(5):1633-5. PubMed ID: 8863557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term experience with controlled expansion cylinders in the AMS 700CX inflatable penile prosthesis and comparison with earlier versions of the Scott inflatable penile prosthesis.
    Nickas ME; Kessler R; Kabalin JN
    Urology; 1994 Sep; 44(3):400-3. PubMed ID: 8073553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Our experience with the implant of single component integrated prostheses (Hydroflex-Dynaflex)].
    Rodríguez Tolrá J; Franco Miranda E; Arbelaez Arango S; Trilla Herrera E; Serrallach Milá N
    Actas Urol Esp; 2002 Apr; 26(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 12090183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical reliability, surgical complications, and patient and partner satisfaction of the modern three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis.
    Govier FE; Gibbons RP; Correa RJ; Pritchett TR; Kramer-Levien D
    Urology; 1998 Aug; 52(2):282-6. PubMed ID: 9697795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.