162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8924667)
1. [The value of MR-mammography at 1.5 tesla in the differential diagnosis of non-puerperal mastitis and inflammatory breast carcinoma].
Tomczak R; Rieber A; Zeitler H; Rilinger N; Kreienberg R; Brambs HJ
Rofo; 1996 Aug; 165(2):148-51. PubMed ID: 8924667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in inflammatory carcinoma of the breast.
Belli P; Costantini M; Romani M; Pastore G
Rays; 2002; 27(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 12696292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MRI of the breast in the differential diagnosis of mastitis versus inflammatory carcinoma and follow-up.
Rieber A; Tomczak RJ; Mergo PJ; Wenzel V; Zeitler H; Brambs HJ
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(1):128-32. PubMed ID: 9022784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [MR mammography at 0.5 tesla. I. Comparison of image quality and sensitivity of MR mammography at 0.5 and 1.5 T].
Kuhl CK; Kreft BP; Hauswirth A; Elevelt A; Steudel A; Reiser M; Schild HH
Rofo; 1995 May; 162(5):381-9. PubMed ID: 7772759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Granulomatous mastitis: radiological findings.
Ozturk M; Mavili E; Kahriman G; Akcan AC; Ozturk F
Acta Radiol; 2007 Mar; 48(2):150-5. PubMed ID: 17354134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Non-puerperal mastitis. Clinical study of 30 patients].
Paredes López A; Moreno G
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1995 Jun; 63():226-30. PubMed ID: 7642146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiodiagnostic aspects of non-puerperal mastitis.
van Overhagen H; Zonderland HM; Laméris JS
Rofo; 1988 Sep; 149(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 2843961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Morphology and contrast enhancement of ductal carcinoma in situ in dynamic 1.0 T MR mammography].
Sittek H; Kessler M; Heuck AF; Bredl T; Perlet C; Künzer I; Lebeau A; Untch M; Reiser M
Rofo; 1997 Sep; 167(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 9376552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic resonance mammography in the evaluation of recurrence at the prior lumpectomy site after conservative surgery and radiotherapy.
Preda L; Villa G; Rizzo S; Bazzi L; Origgi D; Cassano E; Bellomi M
Breast Cancer Res; 2006; 8(5):R53. PubMed ID: 16959028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Dynamic MR mammography: is the course of signal intensification suitable for the differentiation of different forms of mastopathy?].
Sittek H; Kessler M; Heuck AF; Lebeau A; Kohnert M; Untch M; Bohmert H; Reiser M
Rofo; 1996 Jul; 165(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 8765364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Corticosteroid treatment and timing of surgery in idiopathic granulomatous mastitis confusing with breast carcinoma.
Erozgen F; Ersoy YE; Akaydin M; Memmi N; Celik AS; Celebi F; Guzey D; Kaplan R
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Sep; 123(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 20625813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Nonpuerperal mastitis. 3 possible causes including mammography correlates].
Umbach G; Mosny D; Bender HG
Fortschr Med; 1989 Jan; 107(2):65-6. PubMed ID: 2540079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Inflammatory lesions of the breast: indication for MR-mammography?].
Fischer U; Vosshenrich R; von Heyden D; Knipper H; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1994 Oct; 161(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 7948976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Dynamic 3D MR mammography using a rapid gradient-echo sequence].
Müller-Schimpfle M; Rieber A; Kurz S; Stern W; Claussen CD
Rofo; 1995 Jan; 162(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 7841394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcome of initially only magnetic resonance mammography-detected findings with and without correlate at second-look sonography: distribution according to patient history of breast cancer and lesion size.
Linda A; Zuiani C; Londero V; Bazzocchi M
Breast; 2008 Feb; 17(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 17709249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [MR mammography at 0.5 tesla. II. The capacity to differentiate malignant and benign lesions in MR mammography at 0.5 and 1.5 T].
Kuhl CK; Kreft BP; Hauswirth A; Gieseke J; Elevelt A; Reiser M; Schild HH
Rofo; 1995 Jun; 162(6):482-91. PubMed ID: 7605960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [MR tomographic characterization of suspicious breast lesions with dynamic susceptibility-weighted T2* sequences].
Dannert S; Krück W; Schick F; Claussen CD; Müller-Schimpfle M
Rofo; 2001 Jan; 173(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 11225415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with ipsilateral breast carcinoma: the role of mammography.
Muttarak M; Pojchamarnwiputh S; Padungchaichote W; Chaiwun B
Singapore Med J; 2002 May; 43(5):229-33. PubMed ID: 12188073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
