These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8925011)
1. Harms of excluding pregnant women from clinical research: the case of HIV-infected pregnant women. Kass NE; Taylor HA; King PA J Law Med Ethics; 1996; 24(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 8925011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Protection of human subjects. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Code Fed Regul Public Welfare; 1995 Oct; Title 45(Sections 46-101 to 46-409):. PubMed ID: 11686173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Protecting us to death: women, pregnancy, and clinical research trials. Charo RA St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):135-87. PubMed ID: 11656322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Exclusion of pregnant women from research protocols: unethical and illegal. Hall JK IRB; 1995; 17(2):1-3. PubMed ID: 11653053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Institute of Medicine's report on women and health research: implications for IRBs and the research community. Rothenberg KH IRB; 1996; 18(2):1-3. PubMed ID: 11654754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Children as participants in medical research. Grodin MA; Alpert JJ Pediatr Clin North Am; 1988 Dec; 35(6):1389-401. PubMed ID: 3059305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The IRB's role in assessing the generalizability of non-NIH-funded clinical trials. Weijer C IRB; 1998; 20(2-3):1-5. PubMed ID: 11656912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Women and HIV/AIDS research: the barriers to equity. Levine C IRB; 1991; 13(1-2):18-22. PubMed ID: 11659324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Social justice, federal paternalism, and feminism: breast implants in the cultural context of female beauty. Parker LS Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1993 Mar; 3(1):57-76. PubMed ID: 11645225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Protection of human subjects. United States Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Women and health research. Merton V J Law Med Ethics; 1994; 22(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 7749484 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Waivers proposed for emergency studies. Wolfgang L Science; 1995 Oct; 270(5233):25-6. PubMed ID: 7569946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. To be or not to be: waiving informed consent in emergency research. McCarthy CR Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1995 Jun; 5(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 10184356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The paradoxical case of payment as benefit to research subjects. Macklin R IRB; 1989; 11(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 11650284 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical ethics. Principles for human gene therapy studies. Friedmann T Science; 2000 Mar; 287(5461):2163-5. PubMed ID: 10744537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. New human subject regulations would change certain IRB reviews. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1998 Jul; 13(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11656820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Testing drugs in pediatric populations: the FDA mandate. Tauer CA Account Res; 1999; 7(1):37-58. PubMed ID: 11657562 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Historical background of clinical trials involving women and minorities. McCarthy CR Acad Med; 1994 Sep; 69(9):695-8. PubMed ID: 8074757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethical considerations in research involving pregnant women. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Womens Health Issues; 1999; 9(4):194-8. PubMed ID: 10405591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Women's and fetal rights and interests: ethical aspects. Fletcher JC Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 11653145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]