These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8926614)

  • 41. Uterine rupture after induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section.
    Kayani SI; Alfirevic Z
    BJOG; 2005 Apr; 112(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 15777443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Fetal complications after placement of an intrauterine pressure catheter: a report of two cases and review of the literature.
    Wilmink FA; Wilms FF; Heydanus R; Mol BW; Papatsonis DN
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2008 Dec; 21(12):880-3. PubMed ID: 18989829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Antepartum haemorrhage: the influence of first trimester uterine bleeding.
    Obed JY; Adewole IF
    West Afr J Med; 1997; 16(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 9133819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The use of catheter-tip pressure transducers for the measurement of intrauterine pressure in labour.
    Steer PJ; Carter MC; Gordon AJ; Beard RW
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1978 Aug; 85(8):561-6. PubMed ID: 687533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Does placenta position modify the risk of placental abruption in car crashes?
    Delotte J; Behr M; Thollon L; Bongain A; Brunet C
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2009 Aug; 12(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 19675977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. First-birth cesarean and placental abruption or previa at second birth(1).
    Lydon-Rochelle M; Holt VL; Easterling TR; Martin DP
    Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 97(5 Pt 1):765-9. PubMed ID: 11339931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The reliability of catheter-tip transducers for the measurement of intrauterine pressure in the third stage of labour.
    Chua S; Lee M; Vanaja K; Chong YS; Nordstrom L; Arulkumaran S
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Mar; 105(3):352-6. PubMed ID: 9532999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Intrauterine pressure catheter performance in an in vitro uterine model: a stimulation of problems for intrapartum monitoring.
    Devoe LD; Smith RP; Stoker R
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 82(2):285-9. PubMed ID: 8336879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Uterine contraction patterns in patients with severe abruptio placentae.
    Odendaal HJ
    S Afr Med J; 1980 May; 57(22):908-10. PubMed ID: 7404047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Intrauterine pressure in placental abruption.
    Eskes T; Seelen J; Stolte L
    Ned Tijdschr Verloskd Gynaecol; 1967 Feb; 67(1):74-92. PubMed ID: 6045254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Complications caused by extramembranous placement of intrauterine pressure catheters.
    Lind BK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Apr; 180(4):1034-5. PubMed ID: 10203677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Intrauterine pressure: comparison of extra vs intra amniotic methods using a transducer tipped catheter.
    Chua S; Arulkumaran S; Yang M; Steer PJ; Ratnam SS
    Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Mar; 20(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 8172525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The accuracy of catheter-tip pressure transducers for the measurement of intrauterine pressure in labour.
    Chua S; Arulkumaran S; Yang M; Ratnam SS; Steer PJ
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Mar; 99(3):186-9. PubMed ID: 1606114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Evaluation of new catheter systems for intrauterine pressure measurement.
    Chia YT; Arulkumaran S; Yang M
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1993 Jul; 42(1):43-4. PubMed ID: 8103477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A comparison between fibreoptic and catheter-tip bridge strain gauge transducers for measurement of intrauterine pressure in labour.
    Tham KF; Arulkumaran S; Chua S; Anandakumar C; Singh P; Ratnam SS
    Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Mar; 17(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 2064594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Extended use of disposable pressure transducers. A bacteriologic evaluation.
    Luskin RL; Weinstein RA; Nathan C; Chamberlin WH; Kabins SA
    JAMA; 1986 Feb; 255(7):916-20. PubMed ID: 3944997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Monitoring devices and septicaemia.
    Br Med J; 1979 Jun; 1(6180):1747-8. PubMed ID: 466208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A method for the quantitative assessment of uterine activity in the pregnant sheep [proceedings].
    Beck NF; Carter MC; Jansen CA; Joyce PL; Krane EJ; Nathanielsz PW; Steer P; Thomas AL
    J Physiol; 1977 Oct; 271(2):9P-10P. PubMed ID: 926015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Manipulation of external tachodynamometer by the patient: case report.
    Lee CY; Lau MP
    Henry Ford Hosp Med J; 1983; 31(3):170-2. PubMed ID: 6643098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of new catheter systems for intrauterine pressure measurement.
    Chia YT; Arulkumaran S; Yang M; Ratnam SS
    J Perinat Med; 1995; 23(6):437-41. PubMed ID: 8904472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.