109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8927988)
1. Swift justice salvages reputations.
Kaiser J
Science; 1996 Oct; 274(5286):338. PubMed ID: 8927988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. ORI to study why cheaters cheat.
Ready T
Nat Med; 2000 Sep; 6(9):946. PubMed ID: 10973292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Sitting in judgement.
Check E
Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6905):332-3. PubMed ID: 12353003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The United States Government scientific misconduct regulations and the handling of issues related to research integrity.
Price AR
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():253-64. PubMed ID: 9857309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. "Thank God for the lawyers": some thoughts on the (mis)regulation of scientific misconduct.
Reynolds GH
Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 66(3):801-18. PubMed ID: 12625356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Australian junior scientists report damaging lack of support at work.
Woolston C
Nature; 2020 Mar; 579(7799):457-458. PubMed ID: 32173722
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Due process in investigations of research misconduct.
Mello MM; Brennan TA
N Engl J Med; 2003 Sep; 349(13):1280-6. PubMed ID: 14507953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Researcher sues government and specific agency official over misconduct investigation.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Feb; 16(2):9. PubMed ID: 12530382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Both accused researchers and whistle-blowers stay anonymous when no misconduct is found.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jul; 20(7):8. PubMed ID: 16270443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Introduction to misconduct in science and scientific duties.
Soskolne CL
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():245-51. PubMed ID: 9857308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Repairing research integrity.
Titus SL; Wells JA; Rhoades LJ
Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):980-2. PubMed ID: 18563131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Life After Research Misconduct.
Galbraith KL
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Feb; 12(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 28220722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fraud in scientific research: the prosecutor's approach.
Willcox BL
Account Res; 1992; 2(2):139-51. PubMed ID: 16144093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Research integrity and misconduct: a clarification of the concepts.
Khanyile TD; Duma S; Fakude LP; Mbombo N; Daniels F; Sabone MS
Curationis; 2006 Mar; 29(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 16817491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Misconduct poll prompts fury among scientists.
Greenberg DS
Lancet; 2002 Nov; 360(9346):1669. PubMed ID: 12457797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Research integrity.
Ryan KJ
Prof Ethics; 1999; 7(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 12569920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of culture in research misconduct.
Davis MS
Account Res; 2003; 10(3):189-201. PubMed ID: 14979320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bureaucracy won't change the character of a cheat.
Bentley P
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782-4. PubMed ID: 16482126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Arizona professor files lawsuit after being fired for misconduct.
Dalton R
Nature; 1998 Aug; 394(6696):817. PubMed ID: 9732854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Research integrity: Sabotage!
Maher B
Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7315):516-8. PubMed ID: 20881988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
