BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8929315)

  • 1. Assessment of left ventricular function: comparison between radionuclide angiography and semiquantitative two-dimensional echocardiographic analysis.
    Gottsauner-Wolf M; Schedlmayer-Duit J; Porenta G; Gwechenberger M; Huber K; Glogar D; Probst P; Sochor H
    Eur J Nucl Med; 1996 Dec; 23(12):1613-8. PubMed ID: 8929315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-dimensional echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction by the ellipsoid single-plane algorithm: a reliable method for assessing low or very low ejection fraction values?
    Corrao S; Paterna S; Arnone S; Costa R; Amato V; Amico G; Scaglione R; Licata G
    Cardiology; 1995; 86(6):503-7. PubMed ID: 7585762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Left ventricular function in patients with coronary artery disease assessed by gated tomographic myocardial perfusion images. Comparison with assessment by contrast ventriculography and first-pass radionuclide angiography.
    Williams KA; Taillon LA
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Jan; 27(1):173-81. PubMed ID: 8522692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Head-to-head comparison of left ventricular function assessment with 64-row computed tomography, biplane left cineventriculography, and both 2- and 3-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging as the reference standard.
    Greupner J; Zimmermann E; Grohmann A; Dübel HP; Althoff TF; Borges AC; Rutsch W; Schlattmann P; Hamm B; Dewey M
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 May; 59(21):1897-907. PubMed ID: 22595410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance; are they interchangeable?
    Bellenger NG; Burgess MI; Ray SG; Lahiri A; Coats AJ; Cleland JG; Pennell DJ
    Eur Heart J; 2000 Aug; 21(16):1387-96. PubMed ID: 10952828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correspondence of left ventricular ejection fraction determinations from two-dimensional echocardiography, radionuclide angiography and contrast cineangiography.
    Naik MM; Diamond GA; Pai T; Soffer A; Siegel RJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1995 Mar; 25(4):937-42. PubMed ID: 7884101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of LVEF assessed by 2D echocardiography, gated blood pool SPECT, 99mTc tetrofosmin gated SPECT, and 18F-FDG gated PET with ERNV in patients with CAD and severe LV dysfunction.
    Raja S; Mittal BR; Santhosh S; Bhattacharya A; Rohit MK
    Nucl Med Commun; 2014 Nov; 35(11):1156-61. PubMed ID: 25144559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes with three-dimensional reconstructed transesophageal ultrasound scans: comparison to radionuclide and thermal dilution measurements.
    Martin RW; Graham MM; Kao R; Bashein G
    J Cardiothorac Anesth; 1989 Jun; 3(3):260-8. PubMed ID: 2562480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of four echocardiographic techniques for measuring left ventricular ejection fraction.
    Nahar T; Croft L; Shapiro R; Fruchtman S; Diamond J; Henzlova M; Machac J; Buckley S; Goldman ME
    Am J Cardiol; 2000 Dec; 86(12):1358-62. PubMed ID: 11113413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function in cardiac transplant recipients: Side-by-side comparison of real time two-dimensional echocardiography, contrast-enhanced two-dimensional echocardiography, three-dimensional echocardiography, and contrast-enhanced three-dimensional echocardiography as compared to magnetic resonance imaging.
    Rodriguez-Mañero M; Azcárate-Agüero P; Kreidieh B; Alvez MT; Martínez-Monzonís A; Diaz-Dorronsoro A; Cid-Menéndez A; González-Juanatey JR; Barba-Cosials J; Rábago G; Bastarrika G
    Echocardiography; 2019 Feb; 36(2):306-311. PubMed ID: 30600566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Determination of ejection fraction and left ventricular fraction using isotopic ventriculography and bidimensional echocardiography. Comparison with contrast ventriculography].
    Casáns Tormo I; Gómez Aldaravi R; Bodí Peris V; Sanchis Forés J; Ciudad Platero J; Insa Pérez L; Manjón Soriano J
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 1998; 51 Suppl 1():10-8. PubMed ID: 9549395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of two-dimensional echocardiography with gated radionuclide ventriculography in the evaluation of global and regional left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction.
    Van Reet RE; Quinones MA; Poliner LR; Nelson JG; Waggoner AD; Kanon D; Lubetkin SJ; Pratt CM; Winters WL
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1984 Feb; 3(2 Pt 1):243-52. PubMed ID: 6319467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tomographic gated blood pool radionuclide ventriculography: analysis of wall motion and left ventricular volumes in patients with coronary artery disease.
    Corbett JR; Jansen DE; Lewis SE; Gabliani GI; Nicod P; Filipchuk NG; Redish GA; Akers MS; Wolfe CL; Rellas JS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Aug; 6(2):349-58. PubMed ID: 2991357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ejection fraction determination without planimetry by two-dimensional echocardiography: a new method.
    Baran AO; Rogal GJ; Nanda NC
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1983 Jun; 1(6):1471-8. PubMed ID: 6304175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accurate measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction by three-dimensional echocardiography. A comparison with radionuclide angiography.
    Nosir YF; Fioretti PM; Vletter WB; Boersma E; Salustri A; Postma JT; Reijs AE; Ten Cate FJ; Roelandt JR
    Circulation; 1996 Aug; 94(3):460-6. PubMed ID: 8759089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of left ventricular systolic function by deformation imaging derived from speckle tracking: a comparison between 2D and 3D echo modalities.
    Altman M; Bergerot C; Aussoleil A; Davidsen ES; Sibellas F; Ovize M; Bonnefoy-Cudraz E; Thibault H; Derumeaux G
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Mar; 15(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 24047866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Semi-automatic segmentation of gated blood pool emission tomographic images by watersheds:application to the determination of right and left ejection fractions.
    Mariano-Goulart D; Collet H; Kotzki PO; Zanca M; Rossi M
    Eur J Nucl Med; 1998 Sep; 25(9):1300-7. PubMed ID: 9724380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gated blood pool tomography for the evaluation of global and regional left ventricular function in comparison to planar techniques and echocardiography.
    Canclini S; Terzi A; Rossini P; Vignati A; La Canna G; Magri GC; Pizzocaro C; Giubbini R
    Ital Heart J; 2001 Jan; 2(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 11214701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of cardiac function by three-dimensional echocardiography compared with conventional noninvasive methods.
    Gopal AS; Shen Z; Sapin PM; Keller AM; Schnellbaecher MJ; Leibowitz DW; Akinboboye OO; Rodney RA; Blood DK; King DL
    Circulation; 1995 Aug; 92(4):842-53. PubMed ID: 7641365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-dimensional echocardiographic estimation of right ventricular ejection fraction in patients with coronary artery disease.
    Panidis IP; Ren JF; Kotler MN; Mintz G; Iskandrian A; Ross J; Kane S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1983 Nov; 2(5):911-8. PubMed ID: 6313789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.