178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8930036)
1. A prospective randomized study comparing stapled with handsewn oesophagogastric anastomoses.
Craig SR; Walker WS; Cameron EW; Wightman AJ
J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1996 Feb; 41(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 8930036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled in esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.
Luechakiettisak P; Kasetsunthorn S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 May; 91(5):681-5. PubMed ID: 18672632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cancer of the oesophagus and gastric cardia. Standard oesophagectomy and anastomotic technique.
Fok M; Wong J
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1995; 84(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 7574378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Utility of total mechanical stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a comparison to conventional anastomotic techniques.
Santos RS; Raftopoulos Y; Singh D; DeHoyos A; Fernando HC; Keenan RJ; Luketich JD; Landreneau RJ
Surgery; 2004 Oct; 136(4):917-25. PubMed ID: 15467679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis for rectal cancer: a prospective, randomized study comparing handsewn vs. stapled anastomosis.
Laurent A; Parc Y; McNamara D; Parc R; Tiret E
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Apr; 48(4):729-34. PubMed ID: 15719189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis.
Blackmon SH; Correa AM; Wynn B; Hofstetter WL; Martin LW; Mehran RJ; Rice DC; Swisher SG; Walsh GL; Roth JA; Vaporciyan AA
Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 May; 83(5):1805-13; discussion 1813. PubMed ID: 17462404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Side-to-side stapled anastomosis strongly reduces anastomotic leak rates in Crohn's disease surgery.
Resegotti A; Astegiano M; Farina EC; Ciccone G; Avagnina G; Giustetto A; Campra D; Fronda GR
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Mar; 48(3):464-8. PubMed ID: 15719193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Manual compared with mechanical cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis: a randomised trial.
Laterza E; de' Manzoni G; Veraldi GF; Guglielmi A; Tedesco P; Cordiano C
Eur J Surg; 1999 Nov; 165(11):1051-4. PubMed ID: 10595609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of manual and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Hsu HH; Chen JS; Huang PM; Lee JM; Lee YC
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 25(6):1097-101. PubMed ID: 15145015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of anastomotic leakage and stricture formation following layered and stapler oesophagogastric anastomosis for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Zhang YS; Gao BR; Wang HJ; Su YF; Yang YZ; Zhang JH; Wang C
J Int Med Res; 2010; 38(1):227-33. PubMed ID: 20233534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy for cancer. A comparison of neck and chest anastomoses.
Lam TC; Fok M; Cheng SW; Wong J
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Aug; 104(2):395-400. PubMed ID: 1495302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endoscopic-assisted intrathoracic oesophagogastrostomy without thoracotomy for tumours of the lower oesophagus and cardia.
Sutton CD; White SA; Marshall LJ; Berry DP; Veitch PS
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2002 Feb; 28(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 11869013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A single-layer, continuous, hand-sewn method for esophageal anastomosis: prospective evaluation in 218 patients.
Law S; Suen DT; Wong KH; Kwok KF; Wong J
Arch Surg; 2005 Jan; 140(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15655203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early and late surgical complications of subtotal oesophagectomy for squamous carcinoma of the oesophagus.
Griffin SM; Woods SD; Chan A; Chung SC; Li AK
J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1991 Jun; 36(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 1920231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Esophageal anastomosis following gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison of hand-sewn and stapling technique.
Takeyoshi I; Ohwada S; Ogawa T; Kawashima Y; Ohya T; Kawate S; Arai K; Nakasone Y; Morishita Y
Hepatogastroenterology; 2000; 47(34):1026-9. PubMed ID: 11020870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 operations.
Nguyen NT; Hinojosa MW; Smith BR; Chang KJ; Gray J; Hoyt D
Ann Surg; 2008 Dec; 248(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 19092354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anastomotic leak and stricture after hand-sewn versus linear-stapled intrathoracic oesophagogastric anastomosis: single-centre analysis of 415 oesophagectomies.
Harustiak T; Pazdro A; Snajdauf M; Stolz A; Lischke R
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1650-9. PubMed ID: 26574497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The right approach to carcinoma of the cardia and lower oesophagus.
Wastell C; Cahill J
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1987 Sep; 69(5):216-9. PubMed ID: 3314633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison of thoracic and cervical anastomoses.
Blewett CJ; Miller JD; Young JE; Bennett WF; Urschel JD
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Apr; 7(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 11371275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of anastomotic techniques on postoperative anastomotic complications: Results of the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit.
Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit study group on behalf of the West Midlands Research Collaborative
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Sep; 164(3):674-684.e5. PubMed ID: 35249756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
