144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8930474)
1. An interlaboratory evaluation of the Buehler test for the identification and classification of skin sensitizers.
Basketter DA; Gerberick GF
Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Sep; 35(3):146-51. PubMed ID: 8930474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the sensitivities of the Buehler test and the guinea pig maximization test for predictive testing of contact allergy.
Frankild S; Vølund A; Wahlberg JE; Andersen KE
Acta Derm Venereol; 2000; 80(4):256-62. PubMed ID: 11028857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the skin sensitizing potency of chemicals by using the existing methods and considerations of relevance for elicitation.
Basketter DA; Andersen KE; Liden C; Van Loveren H; Boman A; Kimber I; Alanko K; Berggren E
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jan; 52(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 15701129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Guinea pig sensitization assays: an experimental comparison of three methods.
Modjtahedi BS; Fortenbach CR; Marsano JG; Gandhi AM; Staab R; Maibach HI
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2011 Jun; 30(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 21265706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study of the sensitivity of the 3-induction and 9-induction Buehler test procedures for assessing skin sensitisation potential.
Botham P; Urtizberea M; Wiemann C; Manciaux X; Tilbury L; Vohr HW; Allen S; Carmichael NG; de Jouffrey S
Food Chem Toxicol; 2005 Jan; 43(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 15582197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Occlusive patch method for skin sensitization in guinea pigs: the Buehler method.
Buehler EV
Food Chem Toxicol; 1994 Feb; 32(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 8132183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The value and limitations of rechallenge in the guinea pig maximization test.
Frankild S; Basketter DA; Andersen KE
Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Sep; 35(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 8930472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Thoughts on sensitizers in a standard patch test series. The European Society of Contact Dermatitis.
Bruze M; Condé-Salazar L; Goossens A; Kanerva L; White IR
Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Nov; 41(5):241-50. PubMed ID: 10554056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The guinea pig maximization test--with a multiple dose design.
Andersen KE; Vølund A; Frankild S
Acta Derm Venereol; 1995 Nov; 75(6):463-9. PubMed ID: 8651026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of sex differences in guinea-pig maximization test for detection of skin-sensitizing potential using OECD recommended positive control sensitizers.
Nakamura Y; Higaki T; Kato H; Kishida F; Nakatsuka I
J Toxicol Sci; 1998 May; 23(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 9644650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cross-sensitization patterns in guinea pigs between cinnamaldehyde, cinnamyl alcohol and cinnamic acid.
Weibel H; Hansen J; Andersen KE
Acta Derm Venereol; 1989; 69(4):302-7. PubMed ID: 2568047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Classification of contact allergens according to potency: proposals.
Kimber I; Basketter DA; Butler M; Gamer A; Garrigue JL; Gerberick GF; Newsome C; Steiling W; Vohr HW
Food Chem Toxicol; 2003 Dec; 41(12):1799-809. PubMed ID: 14563405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Results with OECD recommended positive control sensitizers in the maximization, Buehler and local lymph node assays.
Basketter DA; Selbie E; Scholes EW; Lees D; Kimber I; Botham PA
Food Chem Toxicol; 1993 Jan; 31(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 8444389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A review of the Buehler guinea pig skin sensitization test and its use in a risk assessment process for human skin sensitization.
Robinson MK; Nusair TL; Fletcher ER; Ritz HL
Toxicology; 1990 Apr; 61(2):91-107. PubMed ID: 2181736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Classification criteria for skin-sensitizing chemicals: a commentary.
Basketter DA; Flyvholm MA; Menné T
Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Apr; 40(4):175-82. PubMed ID: 10208502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment.
Kimber I; Basketter DA; Berthold K; Butler M; Garrigue JL; Lea L; Newsome C; Roggeband R; Steiling W; Stropp G; Waterman S; Wiemann C
Toxicol Sci; 2001 Feb; 59(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 11158712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Italian Guidelines in Patch Testing - adapted from the European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD).
Stingeni L; Bianchi L; Hansel K; Corazza M; Gallo R; Guarneri F; Patruno C; Rigano L; Romita P; Pigatto PD; Calzavara-Pinton P;
G Ital Dermatol Venereol; 2019 Jun; 154(3):227-253. PubMed ID: 30717577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Percutaneous penetration characteristics and release kinetics of contact allergens encapsulated in ethosomes.
Madsen JT; Vogel S; Johansen JD; Sørensen JA; Andersen KE; Nielsen JB
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2011 Mar; 30(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 21091289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The local lymph node assay: a viable alternative to currently accepted skin sensitization tests.
Basketter DA; Gerberick GF; Kimber I; Loveless SE
Food Chem Toxicol; 1996 Oct; 34(10):985-97. PubMed ID: 9012774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preclinical skin sensitization testing of antihistamines: guinea pig and local lymph node assay responses.
Robinson MK; Cruze CA
Food Chem Toxicol; 1996 May; 34(5):495-506. PubMed ID: 8655100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
