These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8930474)

  • 41. To patch or not to patch: what is your threshold for patch testing?
    Brod BA; Dailey AD; Fransway AF; Scheman AJ; Sherertz EF
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Jun; 10(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 10357719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Interlaboratory validation of the modified murine local lymph node assay based on adenosine triphosphate measurement.
    Omori T; Idehara K; Kojima H; Sozu T; Arima K; Goto H; Hanada T; Ikarashi Y; Inoda T; Kanazawa Y; Kosaka T; Maki E; Morimoto T; Shinoda S; Shinoda N; Takeyoshi M; Tanaka M; Uratani M; Usami M; Yamanaka A; Yoneda T; Yoshimura I; Yuasa A
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2008; 58(1):11-26. PubMed ID: 18593646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Assessment of the skin sensitization potency of eugenol and its dimers using a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
    Takeyoshi M; Noda S; Yamazaki S; Kakishima H; Yamasaki K; Kimber I
    J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 14745850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Correlations of patch test reactivity and the repeated open application test (ROAT)/provocative use test (PUT).
    Villarama CD; Maibach HI
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2004 Nov; 42(11):1719-25. PubMed ID: 15350669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Local lymph node assay: validation assessment for regulatory purposes.
    Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Kimber I; Dearman RJ; Lea LJ; Basketter DA
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2000 Mar; 11(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 10684384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of the local lymph node assay with the guinea-pig maximization test for the detection of a range of contact allergens.
    Basketter DA; Scholes EW
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1992 Jan; 30(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 1544608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Recommendation to increase the test concentration of methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone in the European baseline patch test series - on behalf of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis and the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
    Bruze M; Goossens A; Isaksson M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2014 Jul; 71(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 24712382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Assessing the severity of allergic reactions: a regulatory dilemma.
    Basketter DA; McFadden JP; Kimber I
    Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Jul; 67(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 22681462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A risk assessment process for allergic contact sensitization.
    Robinson MK; Stotts J; Danneman PJ; Nusair TL; Bay PH
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1989 Jul; 27(7):479-89. PubMed ID: 2673957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Experimental study for the development of an in vitro test for contact allergens. 2. Comparison of the in vitro sensitization test with the guinea pig maximization test for contact allergens.
    Arimura M; Yokozeki H; Katayama I; Nakamura T; Masuda M; Nishioka K
    Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 1998 Mar; 115(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 9531165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Augmentation of skin response by exposure to a combination of allergens and irritants - a review.
    Pedersen LK; Johansen JD; Held E; Agner T
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 May; 50(5):265-73. PubMed ID: 15209808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Validation of skin sensitization assays.
    Basketter DA; Chamberlain M
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1995 Dec; 33(12):1057-9. PubMed ID: 8847002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Experimental assessment of the sensitizing properties of formaldehyde.
    Hilton J; Dearman RJ; Basketter DA; Scholes EW; Kimber I
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1996 Jun; 34(6):571-8. PubMed ID: 8690318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data.
    Gerberick GF; Robinson MK; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Basketter DA; Wright Z; Marks JG
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Sep; 12(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 11526521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Skin sensitisation testing--new perspectives and recommendations.
    Steiling W; Basketter D; Berthold K; Butler M; Garrigue JL; Kimber I; Lea L; Newsome C; Roggeband R; Stropp G; Waterman S; Wiemann C
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2001 Apr; 39(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 11295477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Intra-laboratory study to determine the reproducibility of LLNA:BrdU-ELISA for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals.
    Chen W; Xing C; Hou F
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2016; 82():26-30. PubMed ID: 27456929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. On the skin sensitisation potential of rosin and oxidised rosin.
    Botham PA; Lees D; Illing HP; Malmfors T
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Dec; 52(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 18586064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Quality assurance and standardisation of patch tests for contact allergens skin testing.
    Brinkmann J
    Arh Hig Rada Toksikol; 2004 Jun; 55(2-3):141-6. PubMed ID: 15285461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Vesicular Contact Reaction May Progress into Erythema Multiforme.
    Czarnecka-Operacz M; Jenerowicz D; Szulczyńska-Gabor J; Teresiak-Mikołajczak E; Szyfter-Harris J; Bowszyc-Dmochowska M
    Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2016 Dec; 24(4):307-309. PubMed ID: 28128086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Patch testing in allergic contact dermatitis.
    Keir J; English J; Fergie N
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 May; 123(5):558-9. PubMed ID: 19138454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.