99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 893049)
1. Cytology and cervical cancer in New Zealand.
Green GH
Ir Med J; 1977 Aug; 70(12):361-3. PubMed ID: 893049
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cytology, colposcopy and cervical neoplasia.
MacLean AB; Lay MP; Kelleher PR; Carnielo RJ
N Z Med J; 1985 Sep; 98(786):756-8. PubMed ID: 3863056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A cervical cytology screening programme in the Thames area. Second and third years of study.
McIndoe WA
N Z Med J; 1966 Oct; 65(410):647-51. PubMed ID: 5224361
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical screening.
Skegg DC
N Z Med J; 1986 Jan; 99(794):26-7. PubMed ID: 3456105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening the hard to reach: improving morbidity and mortality from cervical cancer in New Zealand.
Sykes P; Sadler L; Priest P
N Z Med J; 2008 Jul; 121(1277):5-7. PubMed ID: 18677325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A smear campaign.
Gurr M
N Z Nurs J; 1987 Aug; 80(8):13. PubMed ID: 3696602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical cytology 1980 -- its place and value.
Duncan GR
N Z Med J; 1981 Feb; 93(678):119-22. PubMed ID: 6943454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. How not to organise a cervical screening programme.
Skegg DC
N Z Med J; 1989 Oct; 102(877):527-8. PubMed ID: 2797586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Conventional Pap smears are unreliable.
Reid RI
Med J Aust; 1998 Mar; 168(5):252. PubMed ID: 9539907
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A continuing smear campaign.
Gun M
N Z Nurs J; 1991 Feb; 84(1):19-20. PubMed ID: 1997913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Epidemiology of cancer of the cervix uteri (author's transl)].
Sachs H; Hasche C
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1974 Nov; 34(11):921-30. PubMed ID: 4435345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Knowledge and attitudes on screening for cervical cancer.
Garrett L; Hadler M; Hardy S; Hou T; Middleton L
N Z Med J; 1986 Aug; 99(807):597. PubMed ID: 3462553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening for cervical cancer.
Duncan GR; Jones RW; Svensen TC
N Z Med J; 1985 Sep; 98(787):821. PubMed ID: 3865088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The prevalence of abnormal cervical cytology in a group of New Zealand women using contraception: a preliminary report. The New Zealand Contraception and Health Study Group.
N Z Med J; 1989 Jul; 102(872):369-71. PubMed ID: 2797552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. New cervical screening legislation: access to clinical records.
Lewis H
N Z Med J; 2004 Apr; 117(1191):U829. PubMed ID: 15107891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Examination of vaginal cytology in pregnancy with reference to the preventive treatment of cervical cancer].
Bredahl E; Hahnemann N; Johansen C; Kaern T
Ugeskr Laeger; 1965 Oct; 127(40):1247-53. PubMed ID: 5868551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Epidemiologists and cervical screening.
Cox B
N Z Med J; 1987 Sep; 100(832):603-4. PubMed ID: 3452105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Economics of screening for cancer of the cervix.
Hicks S; Edwards D
N Z Med J; 1986 Nov; 99(814):916. PubMed ID: 3468422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Critique of cytology as a mass-screening method].
Pflanz M
Fortschr Med; 1974 Mar; 92(9):351-2 passim. PubMed ID: 4819501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical cytology in the Auckland region.
Jones RW; Yeong ML; Stewart AW; Hitchcock GC; Dervan WE
N Z Med J; 1988 Mar; 101(842):132-5. PubMed ID: 2832794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]