These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8930495)
1. Olive oil: suitability for use as a vehicle in the local lymph node assay. Basketter DA; Kimber I Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Sep; 35(3):190-1. PubMed ID: 8930495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The murine local lymph node assay: search for an alternative, more adequate, vehicle than acetone/olive oil (4:1). Montelius J; Boman A; Wahlkvist H; Wahlberg JE Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Jun; 34(6):428-30. PubMed ID: 8879933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of strain differences and vehicles on results of local lymph node assays. Anzai T; Ullmann LG; Hayashi D; Satoh T; Kumazawa T; Sato K Exp Anim; 2010; 59(2):245-9. PubMed ID: 20484859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Murine local lymph node assay for predictive testing of allergenicity: two irritants caused significant proliferation. Montelius J; Wahlkvist H; Boman A; Wahlberg JE Acta Derm Venereol; 1998 Nov; 78(6):433-7. PubMed ID: 9833042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of contact sensitivity of metal salts using the murine local lymph node assay. Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A Toxicol Lett; 1992 Aug; 62(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 1509507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of application vehicle on skin sensitization to methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone: an analysis using the local lymph node assay. Warbrick EV; Dearman RJ; Basketter DA; Kimber I Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Dec; 41(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 10617213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of vehicle on the relative potency of skin-sensitizing chemicals in the local lymph node assay. Jowsey IR; Clapp CJ; Safford B; Gibbons BT; Basketter DA Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2008; 27(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 18568891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Utility of historical vehicle-control data in the interpretation of the local lymph node assay. Basketter DA; Gilmour NJ; Briggs D; Ullmann LG; Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Jul; 49(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 14641119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of ethanol:diethylphthalate as a vehicle for the local lymph node assay. Betts CJ; Beresford L; Dearman RJ; Lalko J; Api AP; Kimber I Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Feb; 56(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 17244073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of topical cis-urocanic acid on local lymph node activation during contact sensitization in mouse, rat and guinea-pig. Lauerma AI; Homey B; Vohr HW; Lee CH; Bloom E; Maibach HI Br J Dermatol; 1996 May; 134(5):904-9. PubMed ID: 8736333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of the relative skin sensitizing potency of 3 biocides using the murine local lymph node assay. Botham PA; Hilton J; Evans CD; Lees D; Hall TJ Contact Dermatitis; 1991 Sep; 25(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 1782769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hydroxytyrosol excretion differs between rats and humans and depends on the vehicle of administration. Visioli F; Galli C; Grande S; Colonnelli K; Patelli C; Galli G; Caruso D J Nutr; 2003 Aug; 133(8):2612-5. PubMed ID: 12888646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Effect of vinblastine on the proliferative and immune responses of the lymphoid cells of the draining lymph node and spleen in mice undergoing regional immunization with ram erythrocytes]. Koroleva NA; Uteshev BS; Ianovskiĭ OG; Maksimova GF Farmakol Toksikol; 1987; 50(2):47-51. PubMed ID: 3582634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The suitability of hexyl cinnamic aldehyde as a calibrant for the murine local lymph node assay. Dearman RJ; Wright ZM; Basketter DA; Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Kimber I Contact Dermatitis; 2001 Jun; 44(6):357-61. PubMed ID: 11380546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Induction of skin sensitization is augmented in Nrf2-deficient mice. van der Veen JW; Gremmer ER; Vermeulen JP; van Loveren H; Ezendam J Arch Toxicol; 2013 Apr; 87(4):763-6. PubMed ID: 23143620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of BALB/c and CBA/J mice for the local lymph node assay using bromodeoxyuridine with flow cytometry (LLNA: BrdU-FCM). Lee YS; Yi JS; Seo SJ; Kim JH; Jung MS; Seo IK; Ahn I; Ko K; Kim TS; Lim KM; Sohn S Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Feb; 83():13-22. PubMed ID: 27816673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The popliteal node assay for graft-versus-host interaction in mice. I. Location and proliferation of donor and host cells within the popliteal node. Monié HJ; Everett NB Anat Rec; 1974 May; 179(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 4150729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of a B cell marker (B220) to discriminate between allergens and irritants in the local lymph node assay. Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Ryan CA; Hulette BC; Chaney JG; Skinner RA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I Toxicol Sci; 2002 Aug; 68(2):420-8. PubMed ID: 12151637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immunophenotyping does not improve predictivity of the local lymph node assay in mice. Strauss V; Kolle SN; Honarvar N; Dammann M; Groeters S; Faulhammer F; Landsiedel R; van Ravenzwaay B J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Apr; 35(4):434-45. PubMed ID: 25186098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vehicle and enhancer effects on human skin penetration of aminophylline from cream formulations: evaluation in vivo. Wang LH; Wang CC; Kuo SC J Cosmet Sci; 2007; 58(3):245-54. PubMed ID: 17598026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]