These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8931195)

  • 1. The use of sampling weights for survey data analysis.
    Pfeffermann D
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1996 Sep; 5(3):239-61. PubMed ID: 8931195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modelling the sampling design in the analysis of health surveys.
    Graubard BI; Korn EL
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1996 Sep; 5(3):263-81. PubMed ID: 8931196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incorporating the sampling design in weighting adjustments for panel attrition.
    Chen Q; Gelman A; Tracy M; Norris FH; Galea S
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(28):3637-47. PubMed ID: 26239405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On weighting the rates in non-response weights.
    Little RJ; Vartivarian S
    Stat Med; 2003 May; 22(9):1589-99. PubMed ID: 12704617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using Inverse Probability Bootstrap Sampling to Eliminate Sample Induced Bias in Model Based Analysis of Unequal Probability Samples.
    Nahorniak M; Larsen DP; Volk C; Jordan CE
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131765. PubMed ID: 26126211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Occupancy modeling species-environment relationships with non-ignorable survey designs.
    Irvine KM; Rodhouse TJ; Wright WJ; Olsen AR
    Ecol Appl; 2018 Sep; 28(6):1616-1625. PubMed ID: 29802750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Weighting regressions by propensity scores.
    Freedman DA; Berk RA
    Eval Rev; 2008 Aug; 32(4):392-409. PubMed ID: 18591709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Estimation methods in a sampling survey].
    Warszawski J; Lellouch J
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1997 Apr; 45(2):150-68. PubMed ID: 9221444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficient analysis of case-control studies with sample weights.
    Landsman V; Graubard BI
    Stat Med; 2013 Jan; 32(2):347-60. PubMed ID: 22833421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accelerated failure time model under general biased sampling scheme.
    Kim JP; Sit T; Ying Z
    Biostatistics; 2016 Jul; 17(3):576-88. PubMed ID: 26941240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variance estimation for complex surveys using replication techniques.
    Rust KF; Rao JN
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1996 Sep; 5(3):283-310. PubMed ID: 8931197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Navigating complex sample analysis using national survey data.
    Saylor J; Friedmann E; Lee HJ
    Nurs Res; 2012; 61(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 22551998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Handling missing data in survey research.
    Brick JM; Kalton G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1996 Sep; 5(3):215-38. PubMed ID: 8931194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sampling design for the World Health Survey in Brazil.
    Vasconcellos MT; Silva PL; Szwarcwald CL
    Cad Saude Publica; 2005; 21 Suppl():89-99. PubMed ID: 16463000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A selection-bias free method to estimate the prevalence of hypertension from an administrative primary health care database in the Girona Health Region, Spain.
    Saez M; Barceló MA; Coll de Tuero G
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Mar; 93(3):228-40. PubMed ID: 19059668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Comparison of Population-Averaged and Cluster-Specific Approaches in the Context of Unequal Probabilities of Selection.
    Koziol NA; Bovaird JA; Suarez S
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(3):325-349. PubMed ID: 28281792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Partial misspecification of survey design features sufficed to severely bias estimates of health-related outcomes.
    Schmidt CO; Alte D; Völzke H; Sauer S; Friedrich N; Valliant R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 20926255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Innovative strategies using SUDAAN for analysis of health surveys with complex samples.
    LaVange LM; Stearns SC; Lafata JE; Koch GG; Shah BV
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1996 Sep; 5(3):311-29. PubMed ID: 8931198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian inference for finite population quantiles from unequal probability samples.
    Chen Q; Elliott MR; Little RJA
    Surv Methodol; 2012 Dec; 38(2):203-214. PubMed ID: 29200607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. National Survey of Family Growth, Cycle 6: sample design, weighting, imputation, and variance estimation.
    Lepkowski JM; Mosher WD; Davis KE; Groves RM; van Hoewyk J; Willem J
    Vital Health Stat 2; 2006 Jul; (142):1-82. PubMed ID: 16999003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.