These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8931518)

  • 1. The Functional Independence Measure: tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories.
    Stineman MG; Shea JA; Jette A; Tassoni CJ; Ottenbacher KJ; Fiedler R; Granger CV
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1996 Nov; 77(11):1101-8. PubMed ID: 8931518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Functional gain and length of stay for major rehabilitation impairment categories. Patterns revealed by function related groups.
    Stineman MG; Hamilton BB; Goin JE; Granger CV; Fiedler RC
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1996; 75(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 8645443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Four methods for characterizing disability in the formation of function related groups.
    Stineman MG; Hamilton BB; Granger CV; Goin JE; Escarce JJ; Williams SV
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1994 Dec; 75(12):1277-83. PubMed ID: 7993164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impairment-specific dimensions within the Functional Independence Measure.
    Stineman MG; Jette A; Fiedler R; Granger C
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1997 Jun; 78(6):636-43. PubMed ID: 9196472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity and reliability of the FIM instrument in the inpatient burn rehabilitation population.
    Gerrard P; Goldstein R; Divita MA; Ryan CM; Mix J; Niewczyk P; Kazis L; Kowalske K; Zafonte R; Schneider JC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 94(8):1521-1526.e4. PubMed ID: 23473701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discharge motor FIM-function related groups.
    Stineman MG; Goin JE; Granger CV; Fiedler R; Williams SV
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1997 Sep; 78(9):980-5. PubMed ID: 9305272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comprehensive psychometric evaluation of the UK FIM + FAM.
    Turner-Stokes L; Siegert RJ
    Disabil Rehabil; 2013; 35(22):1885-95. PubMed ID: 23384240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Key neurological impairments influence function-related group outcomes after stroke.
    Han L; Law-Gibson D; Reding M
    Stroke; 2002 Jul; 33(7):1920-4. PubMed ID: 12105376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence-based measurement: which disability scale for neurologic rehabilitation?
    Hobart JC; Lamping DL; Freeman JA; Langdon DW; McLellan DL; Greenwood RJ; Thompson AJ
    Neurology; 2001 Aug; 57(4):639-44. PubMed ID: 11524472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-cultural validation of the Persian version of the Functional Independence Measure for patients with stroke.
    Naghdi S; Ansari NN; Raji P; Shamili A; Amini M; Hasson S
    Disabil Rehabil; 2016; 38(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 25885666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can the ICF be used as a rehabilitation outcome measure? A study looking at the inter- and intra-rater reliability of ICF categories derived from an ADL assessment tool.
    Kohler F; Connolly C; Sakaria A; Stendara K; Buhagiar M; Mojaddidi M
    J Rehabil Med; 2013 Sep; 45(9):881-7. PubMed ID: 23979649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Capabilities of Upper Extremity instrument: reliability and validity of a measure of functional limitation in tetraplegia.
    Marino RJ; Shea JA; Stineman MG
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1998 Dec; 79(12):1512-21. PubMed ID: 9862292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Classifying rehabilitation inpatients by expected functional gain.
    Stineman MG; Goin JE; Tassoni CJ; Granger CV; Williams SV
    Med Care; 1997 Sep; 35(9):963-73. PubMed ID: 9298084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability and validity of the FIM for persons aged 80 years and above from a multilevel continuing care retirement community.
    Pollak N; Rheault W; Stoecker JL
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1996 Oct; 77(10):1056-61. PubMed ID: 8857886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Applying bifactor modelling to improve the clinical interpretive values of Functional Independence Measure in adults with acquired brain injury.
    Gao F; Foster M; Newcombe P; Geraghty T
    Disabil Rehabil; 2020 Jun; 42(12):1753-1761. PubMed ID: 30499346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Equating activities of daily living outcome measures: the Functional Independence Measure and the Korean version of Modified Barthel Index.
    Hong I; Woo HS; Shim S; Li CY; Yoonjeong L; Velozo CA
    Disabil Rehabil; 2018 Jan; 40(2):217-224. PubMed ID: 27930889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The reliability of the functional independence measure: a quantitative review.
    Ottenbacher KJ; Hsu Y; Granger CV; Fiedler RC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1996 Dec; 77(12):1226-32. PubMed ID: 8976303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting functional independence from neuropsychological tests following traumatic brain injury.
    Smith-Knapp K; Corrigan JD; Arnett JA
    Brain Inj; 1996 Sep; 10(9):651-61. PubMed ID: 8853868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The utility of the FIM+FAM for assessing traumatic brain injury day program outcomes.
    Seel RT; Wright G; Wallace T; Newman S; Dennis L
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2007; 22(5):267-77. PubMed ID: 17878768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Agreement of functional independence measure item scores in patients transferred from one rehabilitation setting to another.
    Kohler F; Dickson H; Redmond H; Estell J; Connolly C
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2009 Dec; 45(4):479-85. PubMed ID: 20032905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.