116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8931623)
1. Irrelevant speech effect in aging: an assessment of inhibitory processes in working memory.
Rouleau N; Belleville S
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 1996 Nov; 51(6):P356-63. PubMed ID: 8931623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can the irrelevant speech effect turn into a stimulus suffix effect?
Schlittmeier SJ; Hellbrück J; Klatte M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 May; 61(5):665-73. PubMed ID: 18421641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of speech fidelity in the irrelevant sound effect: Insights from noise-vocoded speech backgrounds.
Dorsi J; Viswanathan N; Rosenblum LD; Dias JW
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Oct; 71(10):2152-2161. PubMed ID: 30226434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Equivalent irrelevant-sound effects for old and young adults.
Bell R; Buchner A
Mem Cognit; 2007 Mar; 35(2):352-64. PubMed ID: 17645176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The irrelevant speech effect and the level of interference in aging.
Van Gerven PW; Meijer WA; Vermeeren A; Vuurman EF; Jolles J
Exp Aging Res; 2007; 33(3):323-39. PubMed ID: 17497373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Similarities between the irrelevant sound effect and the suffix effect.
Hanley JR; Bourgaize J
Mem Cognit; 2018 Aug; 46(6):841-848. PubMed ID: 29600481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: do they have a common source?
Larsen JD; Baddeley A
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1249-68. PubMed ID: 14578082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What does successful speech-in-noise perception in aging depend on? Electrophysiological correlates of high and low performance in older adults.
Getzmann S; Wascher E; Falkenstein M
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():43-57. PubMed ID: 25681737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory.
Neath I
Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):403-23. PubMed ID: 11082850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Irrelevant speech effects with locally time-reversed speech: Native vs non-native language.
Ueda K; Nakajima Y; Kattner F; Ellermeier W
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jun; 145(6):3686. PubMed ID: 31255145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Verbal learning and aging: combined effects of irrelevant speech, interstimulus interval, and education.
Meijer WA; de Groot RH; Van Boxtel MP; Van Gerven PW; Jolles J
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2006 Sep; 61(5):P285-94. PubMed ID: 16960232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does articulatory suppression remove the irrelevant speech effect?
Hanley JR
Memory; 1997 May; 5(3):423-31. PubMed ID: 9231151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of irrelevant speech and articulatory suppression on the serial recall of silently presented lipread digits.
Divin W; Coyle K; James DT
Br J Psychol; 2001 Nov; 92(Pt 4):593-616. PubMed ID: 11762863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Manipulations of irrelevant information: suffix effects with articulatory suppression and irrelevant speech.
Surprenant AM; LeCompte DC; Neath I
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 10881609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detrimental effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall of visual items are reflected in reduced visual N1 and reduced theta activity.
Weisz N; Schlittmeier SJ
Cereb Cortex; 2006 Aug; 16(8):1097-105. PubMed ID: 16221927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Seeing the Talker's Face Improves Free Recall of Speech for Young Adults With Normal Hearing but Not Older Adults With Hearing Loss.
Rudner M; Mishra S; Stenfelt S; Lunner T; Rönnberg J
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 59(3):590-9. PubMed ID: 27280873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigating the role of attentional resources in the irrelevant speech effect.
Elliott EM; Briganti AM
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 22459560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The irrelevant speech effect and working memory load.
Gisselgård J; Petersson KM; Ingvar M
Neuroimage; 2004 Jul; 22(3):1107-16. PubMed ID: 15219582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dissociation between recency and span: neuropsychological and experimental evidence.
Della Sala S; Logie RH; Trivelli C; Cubelli R; Marchetti C
Neuropsychology; 1998 Oct; 12(4):533-45. PubMed ID: 9805323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Aging and distraction by irrelevant speech: does emotional valence matter?
Van Gerven PW; Murphy DR
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2010 Nov; 65(6):667-70. PubMed ID: 20624760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
