117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8931623)
21. Age-related differences in irrelevant-speech effects.
Bell R; Buchner A; Mund I
Psychol Aging; 2008 Jun; 23(2):377-91. PubMed ID: 18573011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Age, working memory, and on-line syntactic processing in sentence comprehension.
Waters GS; Caplan D
Psychol Aging; 2001 Mar; 16(1):128-44. PubMed ID: 11302362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The irrelevant speech effect among younger and older adults: The influence of background noises on reading comprehension.
Murphy DR; Bailey H; Pearson M; Albert G
Exp Aging Res; 2018; 44(2):162-178. PubMed ID: 29319421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise Among Listeners With Normal Hearing.
Gordon-Salant S; Cole SS
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 27232071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Speech versus non-speech as irrelevant sound: controlling acoustic variation.
Little JS; Martin FH; Thomson RH
Biol Psychol; 2010 Sep; 85(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 20553792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Synchronized brain activity during rehearsal and short-term memory disruption by irrelevant speech is affected by recall mode.
Kopp F; Schröger E; Lipka S
Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):188-203. PubMed ID: 16298003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Turn Off the Music! Music Impairs Visual Associative Memory Performance in Older Adults.
Reaves S; Graham B; Grahn J; Rabannifard P; Duarte A
Gerontologist; 2016 Jun; 56(3):569-77. PubMed ID: 26035876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Irrelevant speech and serial recall: implications for theories of attention and working memory.
Jones D; Morris N
Scand J Psychol; 1992 Sep; 33(3):212-29. PubMed ID: 1488646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of noise on identification and serial recall of nonsense syllables in older and younger adults.
Surprenant AM
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2007 Mar; 14(2):126-43. PubMed ID: 17364376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Development of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure: A Working Memory Test for Use in Rehabilitative Audiology.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alexander G
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e360-e376. PubMed ID: 27438869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effects of road traffic noise and meaningful irrelevant speech on different memory systems.
Hygge S; Boman E; Enmarker I
Scand J Psychol; 2003 Feb; 44(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 12602999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effects of meaningful irrelevant speech and road traffic noise on teachers' attention, episodic and semantic memory.
Enmarker I
Scand J Psychol; 2004 Nov; 45(5):393-405. PubMed ID: 15535808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Bilingualism interacts with domain in a working memory task: evidence from aging.
Luo L; Craik FI; Moreno S; Bialystok E
Psychol Aging; 2013 Mar; 28(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 23276212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The role of speech-specific properties of the background in the irrelevant sound effect.
Viswanathan N; Dorsi J; George S
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(3):581-9. PubMed ID: 23883307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Extending the irrelevant speech effect beyond serial recall.
LeCompte DC
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Nov; 20(6):1396-408. PubMed ID: 7983471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Irrelevant speech does not interfere with serial recall in early blind listeners.
Kattner F; Ellermeier W
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2207-17. PubMed ID: 24796760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Robust relationship between reading span and speech recognition in noise.
Souza P; Arehart K
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):705-13. PubMed ID: 25975360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effect of presentation level on memory performance.
Heinrich A; Schneider BA
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):524-32. PubMed ID: 21278574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effects of noise and gender on children's episodic and semantic memory.
Boman E
Scand J Psychol; 2004 Nov; 45(5):407-16. PubMed ID: 15535809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Task difficulty differentially affects two measures of processing load: the pupil response during sentence processing and delayed cued recall of the sentences.
Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 56(4):1156-65. PubMed ID: 23785182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
