121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8931760)
1. Improved ex vivo/in vitro lymph node cell proliferation assay in guinea pigs for a screening test of contact hypersensitivity of chemical compounds.
Kashima R; Oyake Y; Okada J; Ikeda Y
Toxicology; 1996 Nov; 114(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 8931760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Draining lymph node cell activation in guinea pigs: comparisons with the murine local lymph node assay.
Maurer T; Kimber I
Toxicology; 1991; 69(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 1949049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences of draining lymph node cell proliferation among mice, rats and guinea pigs following exposure to metal allergens.
Ikarashi Y; Ohno K; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
Toxicology; 1992 Dec; 76(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 1471161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lymph node cell proliferation assay in guinea pigs for the assessment of sensitizing potentials of chemical compounds.
Kashima R; Okada J; Ikeda Y
Food Chem Toxicol; 1994 Sep; 32(9):831-6. PubMed ID: 7927080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The murine local lymph node assay: results of an inter-laboratory trial.
Kimber I; Hilton J; Botham PA; Basketter DA; Scholes EW; Miller K; Robbins MC; Harrison PT; Gray TJ; Waite SJ
Toxicol Lett; 1991 Feb; 55(2):203-13. PubMed ID: 1998208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A nonradioisotopic endpoint for measurement of lymph node cell proliferation in a murine allergic contact dermatitis model, using bromodeoxyuridine immunohistochemistry.
Lee JK; Park JH; Park SH; Kim HS; Oh HY
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2002; 48(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 12750042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of the skin sensitization potency of eugenol and its dimers using a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
Takeyoshi M; Noda S; Yamazaki S; Kakishima H; Yamasaki K; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 14745850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lack of association between interleukin-6 production by contact allergen-activated draining lymph node cells and lymphoproliferative activity.
Lappin MB; Dearman RJ; Norval M; Kimber I
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Mar; 9(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 9471985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sulphanilic acid: divergent results in the guinea pig maximization test and the local lymph node assay.
Basketter DA; Scholes EW; Cumberbatch M; Evans CD; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 1992 Oct; 27(4):209-13. PubMed ID: 1451484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Allergenicity testing of supermethrin, phenoxyacetic acid and DNCB using in vivo and in vitro modifications of the local lymph node assays, maximization and epicutaneous testing.
Kuricova M; Tulinska J; Kubova J; Liskova A; Fuortes L
J Appl Toxicol; 2001; 21(4):257-62. PubMed ID: 11481656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Skin sensitization potency and cross-reactivity of p-phenylenediamine and its derivatives evaluated by non-radioactive murine local lymph node assay and guinea-pig maximization test.
Yamano T; Shimizu M
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Apr; 60(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 19338586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The local lymph node assay (LLNA).
Rovida C; Ryan C; Cinelli S; Basketter D; Dearman R; Kimber I
Curr Protoc Toxicol; 2012 Feb; Chapter 20():Unit 20.7. PubMed ID: 22511117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and utilization of an ex vivo bromodeoxyuridine local lymph node assay protocol for assessing potential chemical sensitizers.
Williams WC; Copeland C; Boykin E; Quell SJ; Lehmann DM
J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Jan; 35(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 24532485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A sensitive mouse lymph node assay with two application phases for detection of contact allergens.
Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
Arch Toxicol; 1993; 67(9):629-36. PubMed ID: 8311690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the local lymph node assay with the guinea-pig maximization test for the detection of a range of contact allergens.
Basketter DA; Scholes EW
Food Chem Toxicol; 1992 Jan; 30(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 1544608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A re-appraisal of the skin-sensitizing activity of 2,4-dinitrothiocyanobenzene.
Dearman RJ; Cumberbatch M; Hilton J; Fielding I; Basketter DA; Kimber I
Food Chem Toxicol; 1997 Feb; 35(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 9146739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of an ex vivo murine local lymph node assay: multiple endpoint comparison.
Piccotti JR; Knight SA; Gillhouse K; Lagattuta MS; Bleavins MR
J Appl Toxicol; 2006; 26(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 16705757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of contact sensitivity of metal salts using the murine local lymph node assay.
Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
Toxicol Lett; 1992 Aug; 62(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 1509507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of topical cis-urocanic acid on local lymph node activation during contact sensitization in mouse, rat and guinea-pig.
Lauerma AI; Homey B; Vohr HW; Lee CH; Bloom E; Maibach HI
Br J Dermatol; 1996 May; 134(5):904-9. PubMed ID: 8736333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of contact sensitivity of four thiourea rubber accelerators: comparison of two mouse lymph node assays with the guinea pig maximization test.
Ikarashi Y; Ohno K; Momma J; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
Food Chem Toxicol; 1994 Nov; 32(11):1067-72. PubMed ID: 7959462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
