These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 893189)

  • 41. Pupil size and problem solving.
    Bradshaw JL
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1968 May; 20(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 5653414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Letter: Optimal magnification for visual microscopy.
    Charman WN
    J Opt Soc Am; 1974 Jan; 64(1):102-4. PubMed ID: 4813432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Sensory and motor mechanisms interact to control amplitude of pupil noise.
    Usui S; Stark L
    Vision Res; 1978; 18(4):505-7. PubMed ID: 664330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Pupillographic changes induced by diverse acoustic stimulations in normal subjects].
    Boles Carenini B; Orzalesi N; Maffei G; Zini C
    Boll Ocul; 1966 Feb; 45(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 5918769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A statistical analysis of pupil noise.
    Stanten SF; Stark L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1966 Jul; 13(3):140-52. PubMed ID: 5946423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Diffraction and visual resolution. I. The resolution of two point sources of light.
    Halldén U
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1973; 51(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 4739678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Distorted pupil and plant induced dermatitis.
    Boulanger E; Eller A; Chhablani J
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 33(3):NP150-NP151. PubMed ID: 36567500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The effects of noise.
    BERRIEN FK
    Psychol Bull; 1946 Mar; 43():141-61. PubMed ID: 21018316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The bad effects of noise.
    DICKSON ED
    Pharm J; 1946 Jan; 102():9. PubMed ID: 21065652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. ERA of noise.
    Ill Med J; 1953 Jul; 104(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 13069064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. NOISE AND ITS EFFECTS.
    MCCALLUM AH
    Br Med J; 1965 Sep; 2(5462):605. PubMed ID: 14331617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Relationship between Behavioral and Objective Measures of Sound Intensity in Normal-Hearing Listeners and Hearing-Aid Users: A Pilot Study.
    Legris E; Galvin J; Mofid Y; Aguillon-Hernandez N; Roux S; Aoustin JM; Gomot M; Bakhos D
    Brain Sci; 2022 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 35326347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The Pupil Dilation Response to Auditory Stimuli: Current State of Knowledge.
    Zekveld AA; Koelewijn T; Kramer SE
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518777174. PubMed ID: 30249172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Tonic and phasic co-variation of peripheral arousal indices in infants.
    Wass SV; de Barbaro K; Clackson K
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Oct; 111():26-39. PubMed ID: 26316360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of intense continuous- and impact-type noise on pupil size and visual acuity.
    Jones PD; Loeb M; Cohen A
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 2(6):202-7. PubMed ID: 893189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Correlation of pupil size with visual acuity and contrast sensitivity after implantation of an apodized diffractive intraocular lens.
    Alfonso JF; Fernández-Vega L; Baamonde MB; Montés-Micó R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Mar; 33(3):430-8. PubMed ID: 17321393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Light sensitivity of the central and peripheral sections of the retina in exposure to noise].
    Dantsig IN; Diev AV
    Biull Eksp Biol Med; 1986 Feb; 101(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 3947724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Visual acuity with noise and music at 107 dbA.
    Ayres TJ; Hughes P
    J Aud Res; 1986 Jan; 26(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 3610993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Pupil response as an objective measure of visual acuity.
    Barbur JL; Thomson WD
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1987; 7(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 3454921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Factors influencing normal perimetric thresholds obtained using the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Herse PR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 Mar; 33(3):611-7. PubMed ID: 1544786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.