These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8932145)

  • 1. Against her judgement.
    Beech BL; McCormick C; Savage W
    Nurs Times; 1996 Oct 9-15; 92(41):16-7. PubMed ID: 8932145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Legal issues. Refusal overruled.
    Dimond B
    Mod Midwife; 1996 Dec; 6(12):20-2. PubMed ID: 9052162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Liability for negligent advice.
    Dimond B
    Pract Midwife; 1998 Nov; 1(11):10-1. PubMed ID: 10214267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What happened to the midwife in the case of the woman forced to have a caesarean.
    Cronk M
    Nurs Times; 1998 May 20-26; 94(20):18. PubMed ID: 9661457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The right to say no.
    Ferguson P
    Nurs Times; 1998 Jun 10-16; 94(23):28-30. PubMed ID: 9687749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Communications and the midwife.
    Dimond B
    Mod Midwife; 1996 Mar; 6(3):32-3. PubMed ID: 8696813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The midwife and moral dilemma.
    Barki PA
    Midwifery Today Childbirth Educ; 1997; (41):57-8. PubMed ID: 9136427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inside the womb, outside the law.
    Murphy D
    Nurs Times; 1998 Jun 10-16; 94(23):32. PubMed ID: 9687751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using evidence to empower childbearing women.
    Anderson T
    Midwives (1995); 1996 Jan; 109(1296):12-4. PubMed ID: 8603301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of the legal system in the cesarean childbirth controversy.
    Miller J
    Nurs Law Ethics; 1980 Dec; 1(10):1-2, 6, 8. PubMed ID: 6905161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Whose body is it, anyway?
    Hewson B
    Nurs Stand; 1997 May; 11(35):18. PubMed ID: 9239007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enforced caesarean section: a US appeal.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1990 May; 335(8700):1270. PubMed ID: 1971334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nurse and the law. Informed consent and self-determination.
    Langslow A
    Aust Nurses J; 1992 Aug; 22(2):29-31. PubMed ID: 1445015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Court-ordered cesareans--choice or control?
    Rowan C
    Nurs Ethics; 1998 Nov; 5(6):542-4. PubMed ID: 9856072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nurse-midwives attract well-informed patients.
    AORN J; 1982 Jun; 35(7):1418-22. PubMed ID: 6920260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medical interventions during pregnancy and childbirth.
    Rodgers ME
    Br J Nurs; 1998 Nov 26-Dec 9; 7(21):1341. PubMed ID: 10076211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Judge allows a caesarean section to go ahead on a patient without her consent.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2014 Jan; 348():g1275. PubMed ID: 24480397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The rebirth of informed consent: a cultural analysis of the Informed Consent Doctrine after Schreiber v. Physicians Insurance Co. of Wisconsin.
    Ketler SK
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 2001; 95(3):1029-56. PubMed ID: 12778922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Legal dimensions of maternal-fetal conflict.
    Nelson LJ
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Dec; 35(4):738-48. PubMed ID: 1451357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Childbirth Is Not a Medical Emergency: Maternal Right to Informed Consent throughout Labor and Delivery.
    Stohl H
    J Leg Med; 2018; 38(3-4):329-353. PubMed ID: 31307347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.