These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8932970)

  • 1. Uncertainty of the time of first significance in random effects cumulative meta-analysis.
    Berkey CS; Mosteller F; Lau J; Antman EM
    Control Clin Trials; 1996 Oct; 17(5):357-71. PubMed ID: 8932970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical properties of methods based on the Q-statistic for constructing a confidence interval for the between-study variance in meta-analysis.
    van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM; Viechtbauer W
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):225-239. PubMed ID: 30589219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.
    López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A prospectively planned cumulative meta-analysis applied to a series of concurrent clinical trials.
    Whitehead A
    Stat Med; 1997 Dec; 16(24):2901-13. PubMed ID: 9483722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials for myocardial infarction.
    Lau J; Antman EM; Jimenez-Silva J; Kupelnick B; Mosteller F; Chalmers TC
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Jul; 327(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 1614465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accounting for uncertainty due to 'last observation carried forward' outcome imputation in a meta-analysis model.
    Dimitrakopoulou V; Efthimiou O; Leucht S; Salanti G
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):742-52. PubMed ID: 25492741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confidence intervals for the overall effect size in random-effects meta-analysis.
    Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Mar; 13(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 18331152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methods to calculate uncertainty in the estimated overall effect size from a random-effects meta-analysis.
    Veroniki AA; Jackson D; Bender R; Kuss O; Langan D; Higgins JPT; Knapp G; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):23-43. PubMed ID: 30129707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Synthesizing single-case studies: a Monte Carlo examination of a three-level meta-analytic model.
    Owens CM; Ferron JM
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Sep; 44(3):795-805. PubMed ID: 22180105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of an overall standardized mean difference in random-effects meta-analysis if the distribution of random effects departs from normal.
    Rubio-Aparicio M; López-López JA; Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Viechtbauer W; Van den Noortgate W
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):489-503. PubMed ID: 29989344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exact inference on the random-effects model for meta-analyses with few studies.
    Michael H; Thornton S; Xie M; Tian L
    Biometrics; 2019 Jun; 75(2):485-493. PubMed ID: 30430540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bias caused by sampling error in meta-analysis with small sample sizes.
    Lin L
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204056. PubMed ID: 30212588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A simplification and implementation of random-effects meta-analyses based on the exact distribution of Cochran's Q.
    Preuß M; Ziegler A
    Methods Inf Med; 2014; 53(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 24317521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Confidence intervals for random effects meta-analysis and robustness to publication bias.
    Henmi M; Copas JB
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):2969-83. PubMed ID: 20963748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?
    Huedo-Medina TB; Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Botella J
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Jun; 11(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 16784338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A simple method to estimate prediction intervals and predictive distributions: Summarizing meta-analyses beyond means and confidence intervals.
    Wang CC; Lee WC
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):255-266. PubMed ID: 30835918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shortcomings of an approximate confidence interval for moment-based estimators of the between-study variance in random-effects meta-analysis.
    Hoaglin DC
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Dec; 7(4):459-461. PubMed ID: 27231158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficient Monte Carlo evaluation of resampling-based hypothesis tests with applications to genetic epidemiology.
    Fung WK; Yu K; Yang Y; Zhou JY
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1437-1450. PubMed ID: 27507290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of statistical methods for meta-analysis.
    Brockwell SE; Gordon IR
    Stat Med; 2001 Mar; 20(6):825-40. PubMed ID: 11252006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Random-effects meta-analysis of correlations: Monte Carlo evaluation of mean estimators.
    Hafdahl AR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):227-54. PubMed ID: 19527563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.