183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8932970)
1. Uncertainty of the time of first significance in random effects cumulative meta-analysis.
Berkey CS; Mosteller F; Lau J; Antman EM
Control Clin Trials; 1996 Oct; 17(5):357-71. PubMed ID: 8932970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Statistical properties of methods based on the Q-statistic for constructing a confidence interval for the between-study variance in meta-analysis.
van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM; Viechtbauer W
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):225-239. PubMed ID: 30589219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.
López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW
Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospectively planned cumulative meta-analysis applied to a series of concurrent clinical trials.
Whitehead A
Stat Med; 1997 Dec; 16(24):2901-13. PubMed ID: 9483722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials for myocardial infarction.
Lau J; Antman EM; Jimenez-Silva J; Kupelnick B; Mosteller F; Chalmers TC
N Engl J Med; 1992 Jul; 327(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 1614465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accounting for uncertainty due to 'last observation carried forward' outcome imputation in a meta-analysis model.
Dimitrakopoulou V; Efthimiou O; Leucht S; Salanti G
Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):742-52. PubMed ID: 25492741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Confidence intervals for the overall effect size in random-effects meta-analysis.
Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F
Psychol Methods; 2008 Mar; 13(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 18331152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methods to calculate uncertainty in the estimated overall effect size from a random-effects meta-analysis.
Veroniki AA; Jackson D; Bender R; Kuss O; Langan D; Higgins JPT; Knapp G; Salanti G
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):23-43. PubMed ID: 30129707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Synthesizing single-case studies: a Monte Carlo examination of a three-level meta-analytic model.
Owens CM; Ferron JM
Behav Res Methods; 2012 Sep; 44(3):795-805. PubMed ID: 22180105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimation of an overall standardized mean difference in random-effects meta-analysis if the distribution of random effects departs from normal.
Rubio-Aparicio M; López-López JA; Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Viechtbauer W; Van den Noortgate W
Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):489-503. PubMed ID: 29989344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exact inference on the random-effects model for meta-analyses with few studies.
Michael H; Thornton S; Xie M; Tian L
Biometrics; 2019 Jun; 75(2):485-493. PubMed ID: 30430540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bias caused by sampling error in meta-analysis with small sample sizes.
Lin L
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204056. PubMed ID: 30212588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A simplification and implementation of random-effects meta-analyses based on the exact distribution of Cochran's Q.
Preuß M; Ziegler A
Methods Inf Med; 2014; 53(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 24317521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Confidence intervals for random effects meta-analysis and robustness to publication bias.
Henmi M; Copas JB
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):2969-83. PubMed ID: 20963748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?
Huedo-Medina TB; Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Botella J
Psychol Methods; 2006 Jun; 11(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 16784338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A simple method to estimate prediction intervals and predictive distributions: Summarizing meta-analyses beyond means and confidence intervals.
Wang CC; Lee WC
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):255-266. PubMed ID: 30835918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Shortcomings of an approximate confidence interval for moment-based estimators of the between-study variance in random-effects meta-analysis.
Hoaglin DC
Res Synth Methods; 2016 Dec; 7(4):459-461. PubMed ID: 27231158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficient Monte Carlo evaluation of resampling-based hypothesis tests with applications to genetic epidemiology.
Fung WK; Yu K; Yang Y; Zhou JY
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1437-1450. PubMed ID: 27507290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of statistical methods for meta-analysis.
Brockwell SE; Gordon IR
Stat Med; 2001 Mar; 20(6):825-40. PubMed ID: 11252006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Random-effects meta-analysis of correlations: Monte Carlo evaluation of mean estimators.
Hafdahl AR
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):227-54. PubMed ID: 19527563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
