These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8933058)

  • 21. Further evaluation of COMPACT, the molecular orbital approach for the prospective safety evaluation of chemicals.
    Lewis DF; Ioannides C; Parke DV
    Mutat Res; 1998 Jan; 412(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 9508363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mouse-specific carcinogens: an assessment of hazard and significance for validation of short-term carcinogenicity bioassays in transgenic mice.
    Battershill JM; Fielder RJ
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 1998 Apr; 17(4):193-205. PubMed ID: 9617631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Quantitative structure-activity relationship prediction of carcinogenicity of N-nitroso compounds based on category approach and read-across].
    Liang QQ; Zheng WW; He GS; Qu WD
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Jul; 51(7):621-627. PubMed ID: 28693087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
    Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mechanistic QSAR of aromatic amines: new models for discriminating between homocyclic mutagens and nonmutagens, and validation of models for carcinogens.
    Benigni R; Bossa C; Netzeva T; Rodomonte A; Tsakovska I
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2007 Dec; 48(9):754-71. PubMed ID: 18008355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. QSARS of mutagens and carcinogens: two case studies illustrating problems in the construction of models for noncongeneric chemicals.
    Benigni R; Richard AM
    Mutat Res; 1996 Nov; 371(1-2):29-46. PubMed ID: 8950348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. COMPACT and molecular structure in toxicity assessment: a prospective evaluation of 30 chemicals currently being tested for rodent carcinogenicity by the NCI/NTP.
    Lewis DF; Ioannides C; Parke DV
    Environ Health Perspect; 1996 Oct; 104 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):1011-6. PubMed ID: 8933049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How well can in vitro data predict in vivo effects of chemicals? Rodent carcinogenicity as a case study.
    Anthony Tony Cox L; Popken DA; Kaplan AM; Plunkett LM; Becker RA
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Jun; 77():54-64. PubMed ID: 26879462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Structure-activity relations: maximizing the usefulness of mutagenicity and carcinogenicity databases.
    Klopman G; Rosenkranz H
    Environ Health Perspect; 1991 Dec; 96():67-75. PubMed ID: 1820281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Application of genomic biomarkers to predict increased lung tumor incidence in 2-year rodent cancer bioassays.
    Thomas RS; Pluta L; Yang L; Halsey TA
    Toxicol Sci; 2007 May; 97(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 17311802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predicting chemical carcinogenesis in rodents: the state of the art in light of a comparative exercise.
    Benigni R
    Mutat Res; 1995 Feb; 334(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 7528333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison between rodent carcinogenicity test results of 44 chemicals and a number of predictive systems.
    Lewis DF
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1994 Dec; 20(3 Pt 1):215-22. PubMed ID: 7724831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Novel naïve Bayes classification models for predicting the carcinogenicity of chemicals.
    Zhang H; Cao ZX; Li M; Li YZ; Peng C
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2016 Nov; 97():141-149. PubMed ID: 27597133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. QSAR Study for Carcinogenic Potency of Aromatic Amines Based on GEP and MLPs.
    Song F; Zhang A; Liang H; Cui L; Li W; Si H; Duan Y; Zhai H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 27854309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quantitative structure-activity relationship modelling of the carcinogenic risk of nitroso compounds using regression analysis and the TOPS-MODE approach.
    Helguera AM; Pérez-Machado G; Cordeiro MN; Combes RD
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Apr; 21(3-4):277-304. PubMed ID: 20544552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. QSARs of aromatic amines: identification of potent carcinogens.
    Franke R; Gruska A; Bossa C; Benigni R
    Mutat Res; 2010 Sep; 691(1-2):27-40. PubMed ID: 20600167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quantitative structure-carcinogenicity relationship for detecting structural alerts in nitroso compounds: species, rat; sex, female; route of administration, gavage.
    Morales Helguera A; Pérez González M; Dias Soeiro Cordeiro MN; Cabrera Pérez MA
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 21(3):633-42. PubMed ID: 18293904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quantitative structure carcinogenicity relationship for detecting structural alerts in nitroso-compounds: species: rat; sex: male; route of administration: water.
    Helguera AM; Cordeiro MN; Pérez MA; Combes RD; González MP
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2008 Sep; 231(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 18533217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A radial-distribution-function approach for predicting rodent carcinogenicity.
    Morales AH; Cabrera Pérez MA; González MP
    J Mol Model; 2006 Sep; 12(6):769-80. PubMed ID: 16421721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development and validation of a robust QSAR model for prediction of carcinogenicity of drugs.
    Kar S; Roy K
    Indian J Biochem Biophys; 2011 Apr; 48(2):111-22. PubMed ID: 21682143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.