These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8933314)

  • 1. The efficacy and comfort of full-body vacuum splints for cervical-spine immobilization.
    Hamilton RS; Pons PT
    J Emerg Med; 1996; 14(5):553-9. PubMed ID: 8933314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of a vacuum splint device to a rigid backboard for spinal immobilization.
    Johnson DR; Hauswald M; Stockhoff C
    Am J Emerg Med; 1996 Jul; 14(4):369-72. PubMed ID: 8768157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improvised vs Standard Cervical Collar to Restrict Spine Movement in the Backcountry Environment.
    Porter A; Difrancesca M; Slack S; Hudecek L; McIntosh SE
    Wilderness Environ Med; 2019 Dec; 30(4):412-416. PubMed ID: 31706730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Comparison of Cervical Spine Motion After Immobilization With a Traditional Spine Board and Full-Body Vacuum-Mattress Splint.
    Etier BE; Norte GE; Gleason MM; Richter DL; Pugh KF; Thomson KB; Slater LV; Hart JM; Brockmeier SF; Diduch DR
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2017 Dec; 5(12):2325967117744757. PubMed ID: 29318167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Backboard versus mattress splint immobilization: a comparison of symptoms generated.
    Chan D; Goldberg RM; Mason J; Chan L
    J Emerg Med; 1996; 14(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 8782022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of two new immobilization collars.
    Rosen PB; McSwain NE; Arata M; Stahl S; Mercer D
    Ann Emerg Med; 1992 Oct; 21(10):1189-95. PubMed ID: 1416295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long backboard versus vacuum mattress splint to immobilize whole spine in trauma victims in the field: a randomized clinical trial.
    Mahshidfar B; Mofidi M; Yari AR; Mehrsorosh S
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2013 Oct; 28(5):462-5. PubMed ID: 23746392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of a SAM splint-molded cervical collar with a Philadelphia cervical collar.
    McGrath T; Murphy C
    Wilderness Environ Med; 2009; 20(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 19594206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the Vacuum Mattress versus the Spine Board Alone for Immobilization of the Cervical Spine Injured Patient: A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study.
    Prasarn ML; Hyldmo PK; Zdziarski LA; Loewy E; Dubose D; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Dec; 42(24):E1398-E1402. PubMed ID: 28591075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of tissue-interface pressure in healthy subjects lying on two trauma splinting devices: The vacuum mattress splint and long spine board.
    Pernik MN; Seidel HH; Blalock RE; Burgess AR; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR; Prasarn ML
    Injury; 2016 Aug; 47(8):1801-5. PubMed ID: 27324323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Padded vs unpadded spine board for cervical spine immobilization.
    Walton R; DeSalvo JF; Ernst AA; Shahane A
    Acad Emerg Med; 1995 Aug; 2(8):725-8. PubMed ID: 7584752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of cervical spine immobilization during patient transport in emergency medical services.
    Nolte PC; Uzun DD; Häske D; Weerts J; Münzberg M; Rittmann A; Grützner PA; Kreinest M
    Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2021 Jun; 47(3):719-726. PubMed ID: 31030223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing the Efficacy of Methods for Immobilizing the Cervical Spine.
    Rahmatalla S; DeShaw J; Stilley J; Denning G; Jennissen C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Jan; 44(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 29916958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Remaining Cervical Spine Movement Under Different Immobilization Techniques.
    Uzun DD; Jung MK; Weerts J; Münzberg M; Grützner PA; Häske D; Kreinest M
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2020 Aug; 35(4):382-387. PubMed ID: 32430091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the Nebraska collar, a new prototype cervical immobilization collar, with three standard models.
    Alberts LR; Mahoney CR; Neff JR
    J Orthop Trauma; 1998 Aug; 12(6):425-30. PubMed ID: 9715451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do cervical collars and cervicothoracic orthoses effectively stabilize the injured cervical spine? A biomechanical investigation.
    Ivancic PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E767-74. PubMed ID: 23486409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Emergency cervical-spine immobilization.
    Chandler DR; Nemejc C; Adkins RH; Waters RL
    Ann Emerg Med; 1992 Oct; 21(10):1185-8. PubMed ID: 1416294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A review of spinal immobilization techniques.
    De Lorenzo RA
    J Emerg Med; 1996; 14(5):603-13. PubMed ID: 8933323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical Spinal Immobilization: A Head-to-Head Comparison of a One-Step Spray-on Foam Splint Versus Structural Aluminum Malleable Splint Immobilization.
    Roebke AJ; Bates N; Jurenovich K; Yu E; Karnes J; Khan S; Kman N; Groth A; Martin KD
    Mil Med; 2023 Aug; 188(9-10):e2987-e2991. PubMed ID: 36943370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical spine stabilization in pediatric patients: evaluation of current techniques.
    Huerta C; Griffith R; Joyce SM
    Ann Emerg Med; 1987 Oct; 16(10):1121-6. PubMed ID: 3662157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.