These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8933436)

  • 1. Smear layer instability caused by hemostatic agents.
    Land MF; Couri CC; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Nov; 76(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 8933436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Review of the pH of hemostatic agents used in tissue displacement.
    Woody RD; Miller A; Staffanou RS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Aug; 70(2):191-2. PubMed ID: 8371184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Disturbance of the dentinal smear layer by acidic hemostatic agents.
    Land MF; Rosenstiel SF; Sandrik JL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Jul; 72(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 8083841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A scanning electron microscopic study of tooth surface changes induced by tannic acid.
    Sabbak SA; Hassanin MB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Feb; 79(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 9513103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Micromorphological investigation of noncarious cervical lesions treated with demineralizing agents.
    Sakoolnamarka R; Burrow MF; Prawer S; Tyas MJ
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 11317374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of tooth-preparation cleansing protocol on the bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to dentin contaminated with a hemostatic agent.
    Chaiyabutr Y; Kois JC
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 21488725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bond strength of composite to astringent-contaminated dentin using self-etching adhesives.
    O'Keefe KL; Pinzon LM; Rivera B; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):168-72. PubMed ID: 16158807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of etching agent on dentinal adhesive interface in primary teeth.
    Rontani RM; Ducatti CH; Garcia-Godoy F; De Goes MF
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 11314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of acid etching on dentin surface: SEM morphological study.
    Matos AB; Palma RG; Saraceni CH; Matson E
    Braz Dent J; 1997; 8(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 9485635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Polymerization time compatibility index of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials with conventional and experimental gingival margin displacement agents.
    Nowakowska D; Raszewski Z; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Więckiewicz W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 24461950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of dental adhesive systems using scanning electron microscopy.
    Perdigao J; Swift EJ
    Int Dent J; 1994 Aug; 44(4):349-59. PubMed ID: 7822061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of hemostatic agents on dentin and enamel surfaces and dental bonding: a systematic review.
    Bernades Kde O; Hilgert LA; Ribeiro AP; Garcia FC; Pereira PN
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Nov; 145(11):1120-8. PubMed ID: 25359643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A pilot study of exposure of the smear layer to tannic acid solutions.
    Takahashi H; Okamoto Y; Fujinaka S; Shintani H
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Sep; 70(3):261-3. PubMed ID: 8410735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of smear layers on the bonding of a self-etching primer to dentin.
    Tay FR; Carvalho R; Sano H; Pashley DH
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(2):99-116. PubMed ID: 11317405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro kinetic study of absorbency of retraction cords.
    Csempesz F; Vág J; Fazekas A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 12589285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of a carbon dioxide laser on periodontally involved root surfaces.
    Misra V; Mehrotra KK; Dixit J; Maitra SC
    J Periodontol; 1999 Sep; 70(9):1046-52. PubMed ID: 10505808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A minimally destructive technique for removing the smear layer from dentine surfaces.
    Shellis RP; Curtis AR
    J Dent; 2010 Nov; 38(11):941-4. PubMed ID: 20659525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Influence of Hemostatic Agents and Cordless Gingival Retraction Materials on Smear Layer: An Ex vivo Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis.
    Sahu SK; Nagda SJ
    Int J Appl Basic Med Res; 2021; 11(3):143-147. PubMed ID: 34458115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A scanning electron microscopic study of the effect of Gluma CPS bonding system on dentinal smear layers produced by different bur types and rotational speeds and on the resin-dentin interface.
    Santini A; Mitchell S
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Nov; 29(11):737-47. PubMed ID: 10200724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of smear layer thickness and pH of self-etching adhesive systems on the bond strength and gap formation to dentin.
    Kenshima S; Reis A; Uceda-Gomez N; Tancredo Lde L; Filho LE; Nogueira FN; Loguercio AD
    J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 16052760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.