111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8933438)
1. Four different core materials measured for fracture strength in combination with five different designs of endodontic posts.
Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Condos S; Deutsch AS
J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Nov; 76(5):487-95. PubMed ID: 8933438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fracture strength of three different core materials in combination with three different endodontic posts.
Cohen BI; Condos S; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(2):178-82. PubMed ID: 8003200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cyclic fatigue testing of five endodontic post designs supported by four core materials.
Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Newman I; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Nov; 78(5):458-64. PubMed ID: 9399187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro evaluation of five core materials.
Gu S; Rasimick BJ; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 17244304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture strengths of three core restorative materials supported with or without a prefabricated split-shank post.
Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Dec; 78(6):560-5. PubMed ID: 9421784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retention of three endodontic posts cemented with five dental cements.
Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Newman I; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 May; 79(5):520-5. PubMed ID: 9597604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retention of a core material supported by three post head designs.
Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Newman I; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jun; 83(6):624-8. PubMed ID: 10842128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of an adhesive resin luting agent on the dowel-head retention of three different core materials.
Aksoy G; Cotert HS; Korkut L
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 May; 93(5):439-45. PubMed ID: 15867753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture resistance of five pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation.
Burke FJ; Shaglouf AG; Combe EC; Wilson NH
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 11203847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Torsional resistance of crowns cemented to composite cores involving three stainless steel endodontic post designs.
Cohen BI; Penugonda B; Pagnillo MK; Schulman A; Hittelman E
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 10898840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro fatigue resistance of glass ionomer cements used in post-and-core applications.
Gateau P; Sabek M; Dailey B
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Aug; 86(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 11514801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of core diameter and surface treatment on the retention of resin composite cores to prefabricated endodontic posts.
Artopoulou II; O'Keefe KL; Powers JM
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 16681499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparative investigation of compressive resistance of glass-cermet cements used as a core material in post-core systems].
Ersoy E; Cetiner S; Koçak F
Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1989 Sep; 16(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 2518746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pilot study of the cyclic fatigue characteristics of five endodontic posts with four core materials.
Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Newman I; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Jan; 27(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 10632848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Strength of core build-up materials in endodontically treated teeth.
Foley J; Saunders E; Saunders WP
Am J Dent; 1997 Aug; 10(4):166-72. PubMed ID: 9590902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fatigue testing and microscopic evaluation of post and core restorations under artificial crowns.
Gateau P; Sabek M; Dailey B
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Sep; 82(3):341-7. PubMed ID: 10479263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture strength of different core build-up designs.
Bolhuis HPB ; De Gee AJ; Feilzer AJ; Davidson CL
Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):286-90. PubMed ID: 11803991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the shear bond strength of a titanium composite resin material with dentinal bonding agents versus glass ionomer cements.
Cohen BI; Condos S; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Dec; 68(6):904-9. PubMed ID: 1494117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In Vitro Assessment of Retention and Resistance Failure Loads of Teeth Restored with a Complete Coverage Restoration and Different Core Materials.
Tsiagali V; Kirmanidou Y; Pissiotis A; Michalakis K
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e229-e236. PubMed ID: 29143388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
