BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8933784)

  • 1. Conspicuity of normal and pathologic female pelvic anatomy: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images and fast spin echo T2-weighted images.
    Troiano RN; Lange RC; McCarthy S
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1996; 20(6):871-7. PubMed ID: 8933784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal lesions: comparison of three fat-saturation pulse sequences.
    Pui MH; Goh PS; Choo HF; Fok EC
    Australas Radiol; 1997 May; 41(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 9153802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: MR findings and value of T1-versus T2-weighted fast spin-echo images.
    Yasumoto M; Shibuya H; Takeda M; Korenaga T
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Apr; 164(4):981-7. PubMed ID: 7726062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimal MR protocol for hepatic hemangiomas. Comparison of conventional spin-echo sequences with T2-weighted turbo spin-echo and serial gradient-echo (FLASH) sequences with gadolinium enhancement.
    Kim TK; Choi BI; Han JK; Jang HJ; Han MC
    Acta Radiol; 1997 Jul; 38(4 Pt 1):565-71. PubMed ID: 9240679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of gadolinium-enhanced fat-saturated T1-weighted FLAIR and fast spin-echo MRI of the spine at 3 T for evaluation of extradural lesions.
    Shah KB; Guha-Thakurta N; Schellingerhout D; Madewell JE; Kumar AJ; Costelloe CM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Sep; 197(3):697-703. PubMed ID: 21862814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
    Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
    Low RN; Francis IR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1051-9. PubMed ID: 9308464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MR imaging of peritoneal disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled and spin-echo imaging.
    Low RN; Sigeti JS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1131-40. PubMed ID: 7976889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of T1 shortening on T2-weighted MRI sequences: comparison of hepatic mass conspicuity on images acquired before and after gadolinium enhancement.
    Chang SD; Thoeni RF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1318-23. PubMed ID: 18430850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrast enhancement of intracranial lesions: conventional T1-weighted spin-echo versus fast spin-echo MR imaging techniques.
    Sugahara T; Korogi Y; Ge Y; Shigematsu Y; Liang L; Yoshizumi K; Kitajima M; Takahashi M
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1999 Sep; 20(8):1554-9. PubMed ID: 10512245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images.
    Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of pseudocapsule of renal cell carcinoma with MR imaging and CT.
    Yamashita Y; Honda S; Nishiharu T; Urata J; Takahashi M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 May; 166(5):1151-5. PubMed ID: 8615260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Gadolinium-DTPA combined with a fat suppression technique in studies with magnetic resonance at 0.5 T in soft-tissue neoplasms].
    Battolla L; Zampa V; Mascalchi M; Falaschi F; Bagnolesi P; Tessa C; Paolicchi A; Bartolozzi C
    Radiol Med; 1994 Oct; 88(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 7997603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MRI of the uterus, uterine cervix, and vagina: diagnostic performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar gradient-echo imaging in comparison with fast spin-echo T2-weighted pulse imaging.
    Liu PF; Krestin GP; Huch RA; Göhde SC; Caduff RF; Debatin JF
    Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(8):1433-40. PubMed ID: 9853231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Parametrial infiltration of cervix carcinoma: diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted SE sequences at 1.5 tesla].
    Scheidler J; Heuck A; Wencke K; Kimmig R; Müller-Lisse U; Reiser M
    Rofo; 1997 Apr; 166(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 9198495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conspicuity of liver hemangiomas: short tau inversion recovery, T1, and T2 imaging with gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid.
    Brody JM; Schafer L; Tung GA; Breuer J; Shamsi K
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Apr; 21(4):391-7. PubMed ID: 15778951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic contrast-enhanced breath-hold MR imaging of thoracic malignancy using cardiac compensation.
    Low RN; Sigeti JS; Song SY; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1996; 6(4):625-31. PubMed ID: 8835956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Renal metastasis. Detection and characterization on enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using an animal model.
    Runge VM; Wells JW; Williams NM
    Invest Radiol; 1997 Apr; 32(4):212-7. PubMed ID: 9101356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic MR imaging.
    Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Weikel W; Knopp MV; Schaeffer U; Brix G; Essig M; Hoffmann U; Zuna I; Schönberg S; van Kaick G
    Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):531-9. PubMed ID: 8888254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: efficacy of fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging vs spin-echo MR imaging, CT, and cholangiography.
    Low RN; Sigeti JS; Francis IR; Weinman D; Bower B; Shimakawa A; Foo TK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 8310918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.