These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8933787)
1. Comparison of in-phase and opposed-phase GRE and conventional SE MR pulse sequences in T1-weighted imaging of liver lesions. Martín J; Sentis M; Puig J; Rué M; Falcó J; Donoso L; Zidan A J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1996; 20(6):890-7. PubMed ID: 8933787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The value of in-phase and opposed-phase T1-weighted breath-hold FLASH sequences for hepatic imaging. Xu H; Jiang D; Yang L; Xiong Y; Yang F; Kong X J Tongji Med Univ; 2000; 20(4):290-3. PubMed ID: 12840914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between in-phase and opposed-phase T1-weighted breath-hold FLASH sequences for hepatic imaging. Rofsky NM; Weinreb JC; Ambrosino MM; Safir J; Krinsky G J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1996; 20(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 8606229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In-phase and out-of-phase gradient-echo imaging in abdominal studies: intra-individual comparison of three different techniques. Ramalho M; Herédia V; de Campos RO; Dale BM; Azevedo RM; Semelka RC Acta Radiol; 2012 May; 53(4):441-9. PubMed ID: 22535885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of T1-weighted in- and out-of-phase single shot magnetization-prepared gradient-recalled-echo with three-dimensional gradient-recalled-echo at 3.0 Tesla: preliminary observations in abdominal studies. Ferreira A; Ramalho M; de Campos RO; Heredia V; Azevedo RM; Dale B; Semelka RC J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 May; 35(5):1187-95. PubMed ID: 22128047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MR imaging of the liver: breath-hold T1-weighted MP-GRE compared with conventional T2-weighted SE imaging--lesion detection, localization, and characterization. de Lange EE; Mugler JP; Bosworth JE; DeAngelis GA; Gay SB; Hurt NS; Berr SS; Rosenblatt JM; Merickel LW; Harris EK Radiology; 1994 Mar; 190(3):727-36. PubMed ID: 8115619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma arising in cirrhotic livers: comparison of gadolinium- and ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging. Tang Y; Yamashita Y; Arakawa A; Namimoto T; Mitsuzaki K; Abe Y; Katahira K; Takahashi M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jun; 172(6):1547-54. PubMed ID: 10350287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of a single shot T1-weighted in- and out-of-phase magnetization prepared gradient recalled echo with a standard two-dimensional gradient recalled echo: preliminary findings. Herédia V; Ramalho M; de Campos RO; Lee CH; Dale B; Vaidean GD; Semelka RC J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jun; 33(6):1482-90. PubMed ID: 21591019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Focal liver disease: comparison of breath-hold T1-weighted MP-GRE MR imaging and contrast-enhanced CT--lesion detection, localization, and characterization. de Lange EE; Mugler JP; Gay SB; DeAngelis GA; Berr SS; Harris EK Radiology; 1996 Aug; 200(2):465-73. PubMed ID: 8685343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Phased-array superficial coil and breath holding technique in MRI of the liver. Comparison of conventional spin echo sequences with rapid fat suppressing gradient echo and turbo-spin sequences]. Helmberger T; Holzknecht N; Lackerbauer CA; Müller-Lisse U; Schnarkowski P; Gauger J; Reiser M Radiologe; 1995 Dec; 35(12):919-24. PubMed ID: 8584635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR imaging of liver metastases at 1.5 T: similar contrast discrimination with T1- and T2-weighted pulse sequences. Saini S; Li W; Wallner B; Hahn PF; Edelman RR Radiology; 1991 Nov; 181(2):449-53. PubMed ID: 1924787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multifocal nodular fatty infiltration of the liver mimicking metastatic disease on CT: imaging findings and diagnosis using MR imaging. Kröncke TJ; Taupitz M; Kivelitz D; Scheer I; Daberkow U; Rudolph B; Hamm B Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(7):1095-100. PubMed ID: 11003404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Hepatic and hepatocarcinoma magnetic resonance: comparison of the results obtained with paramagnetic (gadolinium) and superparamagnetic (iron oxide particles) contrast media]. Castoldi MC; Fauda V; Scaramuzza D; Vergnaghi D Radiol Med; 2000 Sep; 100(3):160-7. PubMed ID: 11148882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fatty metamorphosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: detection with chemical shift gradient-echo MR imaging. Martín J; Sentís M; Zidan A; Donoso L; Puig J; Falcó J; Bella R Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 7892452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hepatocellular lesions with increased iron uptake on superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis: comparison of four magnetic resonance sequences for lesion conspicuity. Tanabe M; Ito K; Shimizu A; Fujita T; Onoda H; Yamatogi S; Washida Y; Matsunaga N Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jul; 27(6):801-6. PubMed ID: 19144487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [In-phase and out-of-phase single-shot magnetization-prepared gradient recalled echo: description and optimization of technique at 1.5 T]. Ramalho M; Herédia V; de Campos RO; de Toni M; Dale BM; Semelka RC Radiologia; 2014; 56(2):136-47. PubMed ID: 22709791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparative study of four GRE sequences in MnDPDP-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for primary hepatocellular carcinoma]. Guo T; Zhang XL; Chang RM; Zhang YZ Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2003 Sep; 23(9):946-8. PubMed ID: 13129729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hepatic MR imaging: comparison of 2D and 3D gradient echo techniques. Kim MJ; Mitchell DG; Ito K; Kim PN Abdom Imaging; 2001; 26(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 11429951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]