132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8933793)
1. The impact of 2D versus 3D quantitation of tumor bulk determination on current methods of assessing response to treatment.
Hopper KD; Kasales CJ; Eggli KD; TenHave TR; Belman NM; Potok PS; Van Slyke MA; Olt GJ; Close P; Lipton A; Harvey HA; Hartzel JS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1996; 20(6):930-7. PubMed ID: 8933793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional quantitation of pediatric tumor bulk.
Eggli KD; Close P; Dillon PW; Umlauf M; Hopper KD
Pediatr Radiol; 1995; 25(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 7761150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of lung cancer response after nonoperative therapy: tumor diameter, bidimensional product, and volume. A serial CT scan-based study.
Werner-Wasik M; Xiao Y; Pequignot E; Curran WJ; Hauck W
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Sep; 51(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 11516851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CT assessment of tumour response to treatment: comparison of linear, cross-sectional and volumetric measures of tumour size.
Sohaib SA; Turner B; Hanson JA; Farquharson M; Oliver RT; Reznek RH
Br J Radiol; 2000 Nov; 73(875):1178-84. PubMed ID: 11144795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of one-, two-, and three-dimensional measurements of childhood brain tumors.
Warren KE; Patronas N; Aikin AA; Albert PS; Balis FM
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2001 Sep; 93(18):1401-5. PubMed ID: 11562391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Semiautomated thyroid volumetry using 3D CT: prospective comparison with measurements obtained using 2D ultrasound, 2D CT, and water displacement method of specimen.
Lee SJ; Chong S; Kang KH; Hur J; Hong BW; Kim HJ; Kim SJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Nov; 203(5):W525-32. PubMed ID: 25341167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Standardized 2D ultrasound versus 3D/4D ultrasound and image fusion for measurement of aortic aneurysm diameter in follow-up after EVAR.
Pfister K; Schierling W; Jung EM; Apfelbeck H; Hennersperger C; Kasprzak PM
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2016; 62(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 26484714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maximum diameter measurements of aortic aneurysms on axial CT images after endovascular aneurysm repair: sufficient for follow-up?
Baumueller S; Nguyen TD; Goetti RP; Lachat M; Seifert B; Pfammatter T; Frauenfelder T
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2011 Dec; 34(6):1182-9. PubMed ID: 20945067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of treatment response classifications between unidimensional, bidimensional, and volumetric measurements of metastatic lung lesions on chest computed tomography.
Tran LN; Brown MS; Goldin JG; Yan X; Pais RC; McNitt-Gray MF; Gjertson D; Rogers SR; Aberle DR
Acad Radiol; 2004 Dec; 11(12):1355-60. PubMed ID: 15596373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lung tumor growth: assessment with CT--comparison of diameter and cross-sectional area with volume measurements.
Jennings SG; Winer-Muram HT; Tarver RD; Farber MO
Radiology; 2004 Jun; 231(3):866-71. PubMed ID: 15163822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D SPECT/CT fusion using image data projection of bone SPECT onto 3D volume-rendered CT images: feasibility and clinical impact in the diagnosis of bone metastasis.
Ogata Y; Nakahara T; Ode K; Matsusaka Y; Katagiri M; Iwabuchi Y; Itoh K; Ichimura A; Jinzaki M
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 May; 31(4):304-314. PubMed ID: 28243844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of therapy responses and prediction of survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma through computer-aided volumetric measurement on computed tomography scans.
Liu F; Zhao B; Krug LM; Ishill NM; Lim RC; Guo P; Gorski M; Flores R; Moskowitz CS; Rusch VW; Schwartz LH
J Thorac Oncol; 2010 Jun; 5(6):879-84. PubMed ID: 20421814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new, accurate and conventional five-point method for quantitative evaluation of ascites using plain computed tomography in cancer patients.
Oriuchi N; Nakajima T; Mochiki E; Takeyoshi I; Kanuma T; Endo K; Sakamoto J
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2005 Jul; 35(7):386-90. PubMed ID: 15976067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional Radiologic Assessment of Chemotherapy Response in Ewing Sarcoma Can Be Used to Predict Clinical Outcome.
Aghighi M; Boe J; Rosenberg J; Von Eyben R; Gawande RS; Petit P; Sethi TK; Sharib J; Marina NM; DuBois SG; Daldrup-Link HE
Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):905-15. PubMed ID: 26982677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Image Quality Assessment of 2D
Hausmann D; Liu J; Budjan J; Reichert M; Ong M; Meyer M; Smakic A; Grimm R; Strecker R; Schoenberg SO; Wang X; Attenberger UI
Anticancer Res; 2018 Feb; 38(2):969-978. PubMed ID: 29374729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Low-grade gliomas in children: tumor volume response to radiation.
Fisher BJ; Bauman GS; Leighton CE; Stitt L; Cairncross JG; Macdonald DR
J Neurosurg; 1998 Jun; 88(6):969-74. PubMed ID: 9609290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated threshold-based 3D segmentation versus short-axis planimetry for assessment of global left ventricular function with dual-source MDCT.
Juergens KU; Seifarth H; Range F; Wienbeck S; Wenker M; Heindel W; Fischbach R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):308-14. PubMed ID: 18212214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of tumor size in adult glioblastoma: classical cross-sectional criteria on 2D MRI or volumetric criteria on high resolution 3D MRI?
Wang MY; Cheng JL; Han YH; Li YL; Dai JP; Shi DP
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2370-4. PubMed ID: 21652157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of standard two-dimensional and three-dimensional corrected glenoid version measurements.
Budge MD; Lewis GS; Schaefer E; Coquia S; Flemming DJ; Armstrong AD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2011 Jun; 20(4):577-83. PubMed ID: 21324716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Texture-based quantification of pulmonary emphysema on high-resolution computed tomography: comparison with density-based quantification and correlation with pulmonary function test.
Park YS; Seo JB; Kim N; Chae EJ; Oh YM; Lee SD; Lee Y; Kang SH
Invest Radiol; 2008 Jun; 43(6):395-402. PubMed ID: 18496044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
