107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8934321)
1. Acrylic bone-cement. Influence of mixer design and unmixed powder.
Kurdy NM; Hodgkinson JP; Haynes R
J Arthroplasty; 1996 Oct; 11(7):813-9. PubMed ID: 8934321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of mixing techniques on the physical properties of acrylic bone cement.
Dunne NJ; Orr JF
Biomaterials; 2001 Jul; 22(13):1819-26. PubMed ID: 11396886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimization and comparison of three vacuum mixing systems for porosity reduction of Simplex P cement.
Davies JP; Harris WH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 May; (254):261-9. PubMed ID: 2323141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mixing systems and the effects of vacuum mixing on bone cement.
Eveleigh R
Br J Perioper Nurs; 2001 Mar; 11(3):132, 135-40. PubMed ID: 11892108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Curing characteristics of acrylic bone cement.
Dunne NJ; Orr JF
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2002 Jan; 13(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 15348199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of vacuum mixing on methylmethacrylate liberation from acrylic cement powder.
Bettencourt A; Calado A; Amaral J; Vale FM; Rico JM; Monteiro J; Castro M
Int J Pharm; 2001 May; 219(1-2):89-93. PubMed ID: 11337169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of mixing method on selected properties of acrylic bone cement.
Lewis G; Nyman JS; Trieu HH
J Biomed Mater Res; 1997; 38(3):221-8. PubMed ID: 9283967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Critical evaluation of pulse-echo ultrasonic test method for the determination of setting and mechanical properties of acrylic bone cement: influence of mixing technique.
Hagan CP; Orr JF; Mitchell CA; Dunne NJ
Ultrasonics; 2015 Feb; 56():279-86. PubMed ID: 25260486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of two variables on the fatigue performance of acrylic bone cement: mixing method and viscosity.
Lewis G
Biomed Mater Eng; 1999; 9(4):197-207. PubMed ID: 10674174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of mixing technique on the properties of acrylic bone-cement: a comparison of syringe and bowl mixing systems.
Wilkinson JM; Eveleigh R; Hamer AJ; Milne A; Miles AW; Stockley I
J Arthroplasty; 2000 Aug; 15(5):663-7. PubMed ID: 10960006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The performance of three vacuum-mixing cement guns--a comparison of the fatigue properties of simplex P cement.
Yau WP; Ng TP; Chiu KY; Poon KC; Ho WY; Luk DK
Int Orthop; 2001; 25(5):290-3. PubMed ID: 11794261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Porosity of bone cement reduced by mixing and collecting under vacuum.
Wang JS; Franzén H; Jonsson E; Lidgren L
Acta Orthop Scand; 1993 Apr; 64(2):143-6. PubMed ID: 8498171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of the method of blending an antibiotic powder with an acrylic bone cement powder on physical, mechanical, and thermal properties of the cured cement.
Lewis G; Janna S; Bhattaram A
Biomaterials; 2005 Jul; 26(20):4317-25. PubMed ID: 15683656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of various vacuum mixing systems and bone cements as regards reliability, porosity and bending strength.
Mau H; Schelling K; Heisel C; Wang JS; Breusch SJ
Acta Orthop Scand; 2004 Apr; 75(2):160-72. PubMed ID: 15180231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vacuum mixing of acrylic bone cement.
Wixson RL; Lautenschlager EP; Novak MA
J Arthroplasty; 1987; 2(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 3612140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mixing does not improve mechanical properties of all bone cements. Manual and centrifugation-vacuum mixing compared for 10 cement brands.
Hansen D; Jensen JS
Acta Orthop Scand; 1992 Feb; 63(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 1738962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Static and fatigue properties of two new low-viscosity PMMA bone cements improved by vacuum mixing.
Fritsch EW
J Biomed Mater Res; 1996 Aug; 31(4):451-6. PubMed ID: 8836840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture and fatigue properties of acrylic bone cement: the effects of mixing method, sterilization treatment, and molecular weight.
Graham J; Pruitt L; Ries M; Gundiah N
J Arthroplasty; 2000 Dec; 15(8):1028-35. PubMed ID: 11112200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Innovations in acrylic bone cement and application equipment.
Kindt-Larsen T; Smith DB; Jensen JS
J Appl Biomater; 1995; 6(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 7703541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Elution characteristics and mechanical properties of calcium sulfate-loaded bone cement containing teicoplanin.
Tuzuner T; Uygur I; Sencan I; Haklar U; Oktas B; Ozdemir D
J Orthop Sci; 2007 Mar; 12(2):170-7. PubMed ID: 17393273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
