These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8934595)

  • 1. Matching using estimated propensity scores: relating theory to practice.
    Rubin DB; Thomas N
    Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):249-64. PubMed ID: 8934595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2037-49. PubMed ID: 18038446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robustness of a parametric model for informatively censored bivariate longitudinal data under misspecification of its distributional assumptions: A simulation study.
    Pantazis N; Touloumi G
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5473-85. PubMed ID: 18058854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Properties of alternative estimators of familial correlations under variable sibship size.
    Vogler GP; Wette R; McGue MK; Rao DC
    Biometrics; 1995 Mar; 51(1):276-83. PubMed ID: 7766782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of propensity scores using generalized additive models.
    Woo MJ; Reiter JP; Karr AF
    Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(19):3805-16. PubMed ID: 18366144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The bias due to incomplete matching.
    Rosenbaum PR; Rubin DB
    Biometrics; 1985 Mar; 41(1):103-16. PubMed ID: 4005368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variance and confidence limits in validation studies based on comparison between three different types of measurements.
    Ferrari P; Kaaks R; Riboli E
    J Epidemiol Biostat; 2000; 5(5):303-13. PubMed ID: 11142606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The concept of the marginally matched subject in propensity-score matched analyses.
    Austin PC; Lee DS
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2009 Jun; 18(6):469-82. PubMed ID: 19319923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonparametric estimation of the bivariate recurrence time distribution.
    Huang CY; Wang MC
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):392-402. PubMed ID: 16011685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A general approach for two-stage analysis of multilevel clustered non-Gaussian data.
    Chervoneva I; Iglewicz B; Hyslop T
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):752-9. PubMed ID: 16984317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Principal stratification designs to estimate input data missing due to death.
    Frangakis CE; Rubin DB; An MW; MacKenzie E
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):641-9; discussion 650-62. PubMed ID: 17824995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-parametric estimation and model checking procedures for marginal gap time distributions for recurrent events.
    Kvist K; Gerster M; Andersen PK; Kessing LV
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5394-410. PubMed ID: 17994608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo study.
    Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Normand SL; Anderson GM
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):754-68. PubMed ID: 16783757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal mean weighting through stratification: a generalized method for evaluating multivalued and multiple treatments with nonexperimental data.
    Hong G
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):44-60. PubMed ID: 21843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Propensity score analysis in observational studies: outcomes after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
    Johnson ML; Bush RL; Collins TC; Lin PH; Liles DR; Henderson WG; Khuri SF; Petersen LA
    Am J Surg; 2006 Sep; 192(3):336-43. PubMed ID: 16920428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Monte Carlo evaluation of three statistical methods used in path analysis.
    McGue M; Wette R; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1987; 4(2):129-55. PubMed ID: 3582958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A note on the operating characteristics of the modified F test.
    Blair RC; Sawilowsky S
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):935-9. PubMed ID: 8241380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample size determination for constrained longitudinal data analysis.
    Lu K; Mehrotra DV; Liu G
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):679-99. PubMed ID: 19051207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling late entry bias in survival analysis.
    Matsuura M; Eguchi S
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):559-66. PubMed ID: 16011705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.