These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8934599)
1. A nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator for the receiver operating characteristic curve area in the presence of verification bias. Zhou XH Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):299-305. PubMed ID: 8934599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A model for adjusting for nonignorable verification bias in estimation of the ROC curve and its area with likelihood-based approach. Liu D; Zhou XH Biometrics; 2010 Dec; 66(4):1119-28. PubMed ID: 20222937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Receiver operating characteristic studies and measurement errors. Coffin M; Sukhatme S Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):823-37. PubMed ID: 9333348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inverse probability weighting estimation of the volume under the ROC surface in the presence of verification bias. Zhang Y; Alonzo TA; Biom J; 2016 Nov; 58(6):1338-1356. PubMed ID: 27338713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayesian ROC curve estimation under verification bias. Gu J; Ghosal S; Kleiner DE Stat Med; 2014 Dec; 33(29):5081-96. PubMed ID: 25269427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimation of the ROC curve under verification bias. Fluss R; Reiser B; Faraggi D; Rotnitzky A Biom J; 2009 Jun; 51(3):475-90. PubMed ID: 19588455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nearest-Neighbor Estimation for ROC Analysis under Verification Bias. Adimari G; Chiogna M Int J Biostat; 2015 May; 11(1):109-24. PubMed ID: 25781712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. True verification probabilities should not be used in estimating the area under receiver operating characteristic curve. Wu Y Stat Med; 2020 Nov; 39(27):3937-3946. PubMed ID: 32725910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimation of the volume under the receiver-operating characteristic surface adjusting for non-ignorable verification bias. Zhang Y; Alonzo TA; Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):715-739. PubMed ID: 29338546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard. Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing correlated areas under the ROC curves of two diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias. Zhou XH Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):453-70. PubMed ID: 9629639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Semiparametric empirical likelihood confidence intervals for the difference of areas under two correlated ROC curves under density ratio model. Zhang D; Zhang B Biom J; 2014 Jul; 56(4):678-96. PubMed ID: 24648388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve using partially ordered sets. Zamanzade E; Wang X Int J Biostat; 2020 Aug; 17(1):139-152. PubMed ID: 32764163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Direct estimation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the presence of verification bias. He H; Lyness JM; McDermott MP Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(3):361-76. PubMed ID: 18680124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A procedure for determining whether a simple combination of diagnostic tests may be noninferior to the theoretical optimum combination. Jin H; Lu Y Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(6):909-16. PubMed ID: 18556633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Smoothed empirical likelihood inference for ROC curve in the presence of missing biomarker values. Cheng W; Tang N Biom J; 2020 Jul; 62(4):1038-1059. PubMed ID: 31957095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Jackknife variance of the partial area under the empirical receiver operating characteristic curve. Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):528-541. PubMed ID: 25228637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Novel tests for evaluating two ROC curves under paired samples. Hwang YT; Wang CC J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(3):501-517. PubMed ID: 28541824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]