These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Mental rotation depends on the number of objects rather than on the number of image fragments. Koning A; van Lier R Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004 Sep; 117(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 15288229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation. Lawson R Acta Psychol (Amst); 1999 Sep; 102(2-3):221-45. PubMed ID: 10504882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interactions between view changes and shape changes in picture-picture matching. Lawson R; Bülthoff HH; Dumbell S Perception; 2003; 32(12):1465-98. PubMed ID: 14992424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The visual representation of three-dimensional, rotating objects. Kourtzi Z; Shiffrar M Acta Psychol (Amst); 1999 Sep; 102(2-3):265-92. PubMed ID: 10504884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Orientation congruency effects for familiar objects: coordinate transformations in object recognition. Graf M; Kaping D; Bülthoff HH Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 15733202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of lighting on the perception of facial surfaces. Hill H; Bruce V J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Aug; 22(4):986-1004. PubMed ID: 8756964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects. Hollingworth A J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 16478340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Depth rotation and mirror-image reflection reduce affective preference as well as recognition memory for pictures of novel objects. Lawson R Mem Cognit; 2004 Oct; 32(7):1170-81. PubMed ID: 15813498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Object-based connectedness facilitates matching. Koning A; van Lier R Percept Psychophys; 2003 Oct; 65(7):1094-102. PubMed ID: 14674635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rotating objects to determine orientation, not identity: evidence from a backward-masking/dual-task procedure. De Caro SA; Reeves A Percept Psychophys; 2000 Oct; 62(7):1356-66. PubMed ID: 11143448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A stereo advantage in generalizing over changes in viewpoint on object recognition tasks. Bennett DJ; Vuong QC Percept Psychophys; 2006 Oct; 68(7):1082-93. PubMed ID: 17355033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do viewpoint-dependent mechanisms generalize across members of a class? Tarr MJ; Gauthier I Cognition; 1998 Jul; 67(1-2):73-110. PubMed ID: 9735537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. From geons to structure. A note on object representation. Leeuwenberg E; Van der Helm P; Van Lier R Perception; 1994; 23(5):505-15. PubMed ID: 7800466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In support of hierarchy in object representations. van Lier RJ; Leeuwenberg EL; van der Helm PA Psychol Res; 1997; 60(3):134-43. PubMed ID: 9411458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Temporal limitations in the effective binding of attended target attributes in the mutual masking of visual objects. Hommuk K; Bachmann T J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):648-60. PubMed ID: 19485683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]