162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8934859)
1. Infants with anencephaly, the ADA, and the Child Abuse Amendments.
Crossley M
Issues Law Med; 1996; 11(4):379-410. PubMed ID: 8934859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Baby Doe: nothing to fear but fear itself.
Barnett TJ
J Perinatol; 1990 Sep; 10(3):307-11. PubMed ID: 2145405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The U.S. Civil Rights Commission report, "Medical discrimination against children with disabilities": a brief commentary.
Tucker BP
Issues Law Med; 1990; 6(3):269-84. PubMed ID: 2149130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The civil rights of handicapped infants: an Oklahoma "experiment".
Gerry MH
Issues Law Med; 1985 Jul; 1(1):15-66. PubMed ID: 2931398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Baby Doe regulations: views from perinatal social workers.
York GY; Gallarno RM
J Perinatol; 1990 Sep; 10(3):312-6. PubMed ID: 2145406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anencephalic infants and organ donation: the Children's Hospital of Western Ontario experience.
Frewen TC; Kronick JB; Kissoon N; Lee R; Lynch A; Green R; Whittall S; Casier S; Sommerauer JF; Silcox J
Transplant Proc; 1990 Jun; 22(3):1033-6. PubMed ID: 2349654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Supreme Court asked to review application of Rehabilitation Act to medical decisions.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1985 Jul; 1(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 2931399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical discrimination against children with disabilities: a report of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
Shapiro RS
Issues Law Med; 1990; 6(3):285-96. PubMed ID: 2149131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. When do organs become "spare parts"?
Kushner T
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1992; 1(4):349-53. PubMed ID: 1342355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of anencephalic organs: historical and ethical dimensions.
Churchill LR; Pinkus RL
Milbank Q; 1990; 68(2):147-69. PubMed ID: 2233629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Baby T.
Goldstein DA
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1992; 1(4):345-8. PubMed ID: 1342354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The federal role in protecting Babies Doe.
Gerry MH; Nimz M
Issues Law Med; 1987 Mar; 2(5):339-77. PubMed ID: 2954927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical treatment for older people and people with disabilities: 1986 developments. National Legal Center Staff.
Issues Law Med; 1987 Jan; 2(4):255-76. PubMed ID: 2951349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. AIDS babies, crack babies: challenges to the law.
Bopp J; Gardner DH
Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(1):3-51. PubMed ID: 1830296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Organ retrieval from infants with anencephaly.
Cranford RE
Transplant Proc; 1990 Jun; 22(3):1040-1. PubMed ID: 2349655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The real challenge of "Baby Doe": considering the sanctity and quality of life.
Goldworth A; Stevenson DK
Clin Pediatr (Phila); 1989 Mar; 28(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 2920487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The moral duty to contribute and its implications for organ procurement policy.
Menzel PT
Transplant Proc; 1992 Oct; 24(5):2175-8. PubMed ID: 1413022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Anencephalic infants as organ sources: should the law be changed? Yes--the law on anencephalic infants as organ sources should be changed.
Walters JW
J Pediatr; 1989 Nov; 115(5 Pt 1):824-8. PubMed ID: 2809918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The infant with anencephaly: moral and legal dilemmas.
Berger DH
Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(1):67-85. PubMed ID: 2695496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The ethical issues of transplanting organs from anencephalic newborns.
Fries ES
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1989; 14(6):412-4. PubMed ID: 2514330
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
