These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

476 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8934859)

  • 1. Infants with anencephaly, the ADA, and the Child Abuse Amendments.
    Crossley M
    Issues Law Med; 1996; 11(4):379-410. PubMed ID: 8934859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Baby Doe: nothing to fear but fear itself.
    Barnett TJ
    J Perinatol; 1990 Sep; 10(3):307-11. PubMed ID: 2145405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The U.S. Civil Rights Commission report, "Medical discrimination against children with disabilities": a brief commentary.
    Tucker BP
    Issues Law Med; 1990; 6(3):269-84. PubMed ID: 2149130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. United States Commission on Civil Rights--medical discrimination against children with disabilities: an abstract.
    Boyd DE; Thompson PJ
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1990; 6():379-410. PubMed ID: 10170563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preventive ethics and alleviating care providers' stress.
    Howe EG
    J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(4):283-6. PubMed ID: 7803822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The civil rights of handicapped infants: an Oklahoma "experiment".
    Gerry MH
    Issues Law Med; 1985 Jul; 1(1):15-66. PubMed ID: 2931398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Baby Doe regulations: views from perinatal social workers.
    York GY; Gallarno RM
    J Perinatol; 1990 Sep; 10(3):312-6. PubMed ID: 2145406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The legal response to Babies Doe: an analytical prognosis.
    Rosenblum VG; Grant ER
    Issues Law Med; 1986 Mar; 1(5):391-404. PubMed ID: 3636287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anencephalic infants and organ donation: the Children's Hospital of Western Ontario experience.
    Frewen TC; Kronick JB; Kissoon N; Lee R; Lynch A; Green R; Whittall S; Casier S; Sommerauer JF; Silcox J
    Transplant Proc; 1990 Jun; 22(3):1033-6. PubMed ID: 2349654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When love and abuse are not mutually exclusive: the need for government intervention.
    Obernberger S
    Issues Law Med; 1997; 12(4):355-81. PubMed ID: 9114605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Supreme Court asked to review application of Rehabilitation Act to medical decisions.
    Paulus SM
    Issues Law Med; 1985 Jul; 1(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 2931399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medical discrimination against children with disabilities: a report of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
    Shapiro RS
    Issues Law Med; 1990; 6(3):285-96. PubMed ID: 2149131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Withholding treatment from Baby Doe: from discrimination to child abuse.
    Rhoden NK; Arras JD
    Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1985; 63(1):18-51. PubMed ID: 3158840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When do organs become "spare parts"?
    Kushner T
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1992; 1(4):349-53. PubMed ID: 1342355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A moment in human development: legal protection, ethical standards and social policy on the selective non-treatment of handicapped neonates.
    Gostin L
    Am J Law Med; 1985; 11(1):31-78. PubMed ID: 3832944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comments and recommendations on the "Infant Doe" proposed regulations.
    Law Med Health Care; 1983 Oct; 11(5):203-9, 213. PubMed ID: 6557312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response to "Ethics and drug infants" by Michelle Oberman (CQ vol. 6, no. 2).
    Jain R; Thomasma DC; Ragas R
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1998; 7(1):94-6. PubMed ID: 9523046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medical futility: when is enough, enough?
    Cultice PN
    J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Aug; 27(8):225-32, 256. PubMed ID: 10171943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of anencephalic organs: historical and ethical dimensions.
    Churchill LR; Pinkus RL
    Milbank Q; 1990; 68(2):147-69. PubMed ID: 2233629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Baby T.
    Goldstein DA
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1992; 1(4):345-8. PubMed ID: 1342354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.