These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8935015)

  • 1. Comparison of stainless steel and nickel-titanium instruments in molar root canal preparation.
    Samyn JA; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
    J Endod; 1996 Apr; 22(4):177-81. PubMed ID: 8935015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of curved canal instrumentation using nickel-titanium or stainless steel files with the balanced-force technique.
    Harlan AL; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
    J Endod; 1996 Aug; 22(8):410-3. PubMed ID: 8941749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of instrumentation using Naviflex and Profile nickel-titanium engine-driven rotary instruments.
    Ottosen SR; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
    J Endod; 1999 Jun; 25(6):457-60. PubMed ID: 10530251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of molar root canal preparation using stainless-steel and nickel-titanium instruments.
    Carvalho LA; Bonetti I; Borges MA
    J Endod; 1999 Dec; 25(12):807-10. PubMed ID: 10726526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
    Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of dentine removal using V-taper and K-Flexofile instruments.
    Akhlaghi NM; Kahali R; Abtahi A; Tabatabaee S; Mehrvarzfar P; Parirokh M
    Int Endod J; 2010 Nov; 43(11):1029-36. PubMed ID: 20636352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing apical preparations of root canals shaped by nickel-titanium rotary instruments and nickel-titanium hand instruments.
    Deplazes P; Peters O; Barbakow F
    J Endod; 2001 Mar; 27(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 11487151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GT files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators.
    Gluskin AH; Brown DC; Buchanan LS
    Int Endod J; 2001 Sep; 34(6):476-84. PubMed ID: 11556516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of stainless steel and nickel-titanium K-files in curved root canals.
    Chan AW; Cheung GS
    Int Endod J; 1996 Nov; 29(6):370-5. PubMed ID: 10332236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Canal wall planning by engine-driven nickel-titanium instruments, compared with stainless-steel hand instrumentation.
    Tucker DM; Wenckus CS; Bentkover SK
    J Endod; 1997 Mar; 23(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 9594758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation techniques.
    Short JA; Morgan LA; Baumgartner JC
    J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):503-7. PubMed ID: 9587320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of molar root canal preparations using six instruments and instrumentation techniques.
    Roig-Cayón M; Basilio-Monné J; Abós-Herrándiz R; Brau-Aguadé E; Canalda-Sahli C
    J Endod; 1997 Jun; 23(6):383-6. PubMed ID: 9545948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals.
    Alves Vde O; Bueno CE; Cunha RS; Pinheiro SL; Fontana CE; de Martin AS
    J Endod; 2012 Jan; 38(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 22152634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
    Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Endodontic complications of root canal therapy performed by dental students with stainless-steel K-files and nickel-titanium hand files.
    Pettiette MT; Metzger Z; Phillips C; Trope M
    J Endod; 1999 Apr; 25(4):230-34. PubMed ID: 10425945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison on the shaping ability of three different instruments in preparing curved molar canals].
    Zhu YQ; Gu YX; Du R
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Oct; 23(5):393-6. PubMed ID: 16285543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
    Tan BT; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of Ni-Ti versus stainless steel instrumentation in resin simulated canals.
    Coleman CL; Svec TA
    J Endod; 1997 Apr; 23(4):232-5. PubMed ID: 9594772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of nickel-titanium versus stainless steel instrumentation by means of direct digital imaging.
    Coleman CL; Svec TA; Rieger MR; Suchina JA; Wang MM; Glickman GN
    J Endod; 1996 Nov; 22(11):603-7. PubMed ID: 9198416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.