350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8935115)
1. Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite Class II restorations: an in vitro evaluation.
Dietschi D; De Siebenthal G; Neveu-Rosenstand L; Holz J
Quintessence Int; 1995 Oct; 26(10):717-27. PubMed ID: 8935115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations.
Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Mortazavi F
Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9227124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
Payne JH
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo evaluation of glass-ionomer cement adhesion to dentin.
Mason PN; Ferrari M
Quintessence Int; 1994 Jul; 25(7):499-504. PubMed ID: 7991772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microleakage of Class V composite, resin sandwich, and resin-modified glass ionomers.
Trushkowsky RD; Gwinnett AJ
Am J Dent; 1996 Jun; 9(3):96-9. PubMed ID: 9002797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An in vitro microleakage study of the 'bonded-base' restorative technique.
Yap AU; Mok BY; Pearson G
J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Mar; 24(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 9131479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sealing capacity of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and resin composite placed in vivo in Class 5 restorations.
Ferrari M; Davidson CL
Oper Dent; 1996; 21(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 8957921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations with and without light-cured glass-ionomer (poly alkenoate) cement lining.
Shortall AC
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1992 Sep; 1(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 1291025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simulated oral environment and microleakage of Class II resin-based composite and sandwich restorations.
Besnault C; Attal JP
Am J Dent; 2003 Jun; 16(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 12967073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical performance of Class II restorations in which resin composite is laminated over resin-modified glass-ionomer.
Aboush YE; Torabzadeh H
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 11203844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of multi-step dentin bonding systems and resin-modified glass ionomer cement liner on marginal quality of dentin-bonded resin composite Class II restorations.
Haller B; Trojanski A
Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Sep; 2(3):130-6. PubMed ID: 9927914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An in-vitro investigation of microleakage and gap size of glass ionomer/composite resin "sandwich" restorations in primary teeth.
Reid JS; Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Williams CE
ASDC J Dent Child; 1994; 61(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 7989627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal adaptation of resin-bonded light-cured glass ionomers in dentin cavities.
Fritz UB; Finger WJ; Uno S
Am J Dent; 1996 Dec; 9(6):253-8. PubMed ID: 9545879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microleakage of Class II composite restorations.
Wibowo G; Stockton L
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 11572297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro marginal leakage around Class II resin composite restorations with glass-ceramic inserts.
Coli P; Derhami K; Brännström M
Quintessence Int; 1997 Nov; 28(11):755-60. PubMed ID: 9573868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Volumetric microleakage assessment of glass-ionomer-resin composite hybrid materials.
de Magalhães CS; Serra MC; Rodrigues Júnior AL
Quintessence Int; 1999 Feb; 30(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 10356563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
