These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8935115)

  • 21. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of resin-dentin and calcium hydroxide-dentin interface with resin composite restorations.
    Goracci G; Mori G
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Feb; 27(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 9063224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of a surface sealant on microleakage of Class V restorations.
    May KN; Swift EJ; Wilder AD; Futrell SC
    Am J Dent; 1996 Jun; 9(3):133-6. PubMed ID: 9002805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
    Chersoni S; Lorenzi R; Ferrieri P; Prati C
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
    Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations.
    Owens BM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Feb; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12595929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Adaptation of Class II Vitremer restorations with and without primer: a morphometric study.
    Gleicher H; Fuks AB; Sela J
    Pediatr Dent; 1998; 20(4):263-6. PubMed ID: 9783297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Marginal adaptation and seal of direct and indirect Class II composite resin restorations: an in vitro evaluation.
    Dietschi D; Scampa U; Campanile G; Holz J
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 7568723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of internal bevel on marginal leakage at the approximal surface of Class 2 composite restorations.
    Holan G; Eidelman E; Wright GZ
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(5):217-21. PubMed ID: 9484144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of thermal and mechanical load cycling on the marginal integrity of Class II resin composite restorations.
    Davidson CL; Abdalla AI
    Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 8329161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Marginal sealing ability of three cervical restorative systems.
    Yap AU; Lim CC; Neo JC
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Nov; 26(11):817-20. PubMed ID: 8628842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An in vitro study of the effect of restorative technique on marginal leakage in posterior composites.
    Neiva IF; de Andrada MA; Baratieri LN; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(6):282-9. PubMed ID: 9855849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays.
    Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The influence of lining techniques on the marginal seal of Class II composite resin restorations.
    Blixt M; Coli P
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Mar; 24(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 8511279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 10388369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T; Lösche AC; Lösche GM; Roulet JF
    J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In vitro marginal leakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light-cured glass ionomer.
    Sidhu SK; Henderson LJ
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1437685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reducing microleakage in Class II restorations: an in vitro study.
    Crim GA; Chapman KW
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Nov; 25(11):781-5. PubMed ID: 7568683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.