These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8935115)

  • 41. [Marginal leakage of composite resin and glass ionomer].
    Kfouri Lopes Mda G; Stroparo FM; Beltrami E; Stroparo CM; Segala AD
    Dens (Curitiba); 1989; 5(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 2490127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Quantitative in vivo evaluation of four restorative concepts for mixed Class V restorations.
    Krejci I; Lutz F; Loher CE
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Jun; 22(6):455-65. PubMed ID: 1882038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effect of occlusal load cycling on the marginal integrity of adhesive Class V restorations.
    Davidson CL; Abdalla AI
    Am J Dent; 1994 Apr; 7(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 8054183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. In vitro marginal leakage of Class II composite resin restorations by thermal cycling.
    Futatsuki M; Nakata M
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1994; 18(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 8054304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Microleakage of Class II silver glass ionomer/composite restorations.
    Stratmann RG; Donly KJ
    Am J Dent; 1991 Apr; 4(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 1906718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Sealing performance of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose-Z100 in Class II restorations.
    Ferrari M; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 1996 Aug; 9(4):145-9. PubMed ID: 9002788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effect of different adhesive types and curing methods on microleakage and the marginal adaptation of composite veneers.
    Maleknejad F; Moosavi H; Shahriari R; Sarabi N; Shayankhah T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):18-26. PubMed ID: 19430622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization".
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Märkl A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Marginal seal of a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material: an investigation of placement techniques.
    Köprülü H; Gürgan S; Onen A
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Oct; 26(10):729-32. PubMed ID: 8935116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
    Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effects of total and selective bonding on marginal adaptation and microleakage of Class I resin composite restorations in vitro.
    Schmidlin PR; Huber T; Göhring TN; Attin T; Bindl A
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(6):629-35. PubMed ID: 19051855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Microleakage of two new dentin adhesives.
    Linden JJ; Swift EJ
    Am J Dent; 1994 Feb; 7(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 9115676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A retrospective look at esthetic resin composite and glass-ionomer Class III restorations: a 2-year clinical evaluation.
    de Araujo MA; Araújo RM; Marsilio AL
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Feb; 29(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 9643241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effects of lining materials on microleakage and internal voids of Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Chuang SF; Jin YT; Lin TS; Chang CH; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 12797564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Clinical comparison of Class V resin composite and glass ionomer restorations.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):249-52. PubMed ID: 1299249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Marginal morphology of Class V composite restorations.
    Prati C; Chersoni S; Cretti L; Mongiorgi R
    Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):231-6. PubMed ID: 9522697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Glass ionomer cement and "sandwich" restorations after two years of clinical service].
    Reich E
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Feb; 46(2):161-4. PubMed ID: 1814714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. An in-vitro investigation into the sealing ability of two fourth generation dentine bonding agents and two resin modified glass polyalkenoate restoratives.
    Quinn F
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1995 Mar; 3(3):119-25. PubMed ID: 8603154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients.
    McComb D; Erickson RL; Maxymiw WG; Wood RE
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 12216559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Sealing ability of occlusal resin composite restoration using four restorative procedures.
    Banomyong D; Palamara JE; Messer HH; Burrow MF
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Dec; 116(6):571-8. PubMed ID: 19049529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.