359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8935470)
1. Long term breast cancer screening in Nijmegen, The Netherlands: the nine rounds from 1975-92.
Otten JD; van Dijck JA; Peer PG; Straatman H; Verbeek AL; Mravunac M; Hendriks JH; Holland R
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1996 Jun; 50(3):353-8. PubMed ID: 8935470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening for breast cancer in Nijmegen. Report of 6 screening rounds, 1975-1986.
Peeters PH; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH; van Bon MJ
Int J Cancer; 1989 Feb; 43(2):226-30. PubMed ID: 2917799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators.
Otten JD; Karssemeijer N; Hendriks JH; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; Verbeek AL; de Koning HJ; Holland R
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(10):748-54. PubMed ID: 15900044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of mammographic breast density on breast cancer screening performance: a study in Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
van Gils CH; Otten JD; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH; Holland R
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1998 Apr; 52(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 9616416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Balancing sensitivity and specificity: sixteen year's of experience from the mammography screening programme in Copenhagen, Denmark.
Utzon-Frank N; Vejborg I; von Euler-Chelpin M; Lynge E
Cancer Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 35(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 21239242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammography screening in the county of Fyn. November 1993-December 1999.
Njor SH; Olsen AH; Bellstrøm T; Dyreborg U; Bak M; Axelsson C; Graversen HP; Schwartz W; Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 2003; (110):1-33. PubMed ID: 12739252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dutch digital breast cancer screening: implications for breast cancer care.
Timmers JM; den Heeten GJ; Adang EM; Otten JD; Verbeek AL; Broeders MJ
Eur J Public Health; 2012 Dec; 22(6):925-9. PubMed ID: 22158996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition.
Kriege M; Brekelmans CT; Boetes C; Muller SH; Zonderland HM; Obdeijn IM; Manoliu RA; Kok T; Rutgers EJ; de Koning HJ; Klijn JG;
Cancer; 2006 Jun; 106(11):2318-26. PubMed ID: 16615112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of Risk Category and Screening Round on the Performance of an MR Imaging and Mammography Screening Program in Carriers of the BRCA Mutation and Other Women at Increased Risk.
Vreemann S; Gubern-Mérida A; Schlooz-Vries MS; Bult P; van Gils CH; Hoogerbrugge N; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM
Radiology; 2018 Feb; 286(2):443-451. PubMed ID: 29040037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Age-specific effectiveness of the Nijmegen population-based breast cancer-screening program: assessment of early indicators of screening effectiveness.
Peer PG; Holland R; Hendriks JH; Mravunac M; Verbeek AL
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1994 Mar; 86(6):436-41. PubMed ID: 8120918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening outcome and surgical treatment during and after the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography in the south of The Netherlands.
Weber RJ; Nederend J; Voogd AC; Strobbe LJ; Duijm LE
Int J Cancer; 2015 Jul; 137(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 25418512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Successful first round results of a Turkish breast cancer screening program with mammography in Bahcesehir, Istanbul.
Kayhan A; Gurdal SO; Ozaydin N; Cabioglu N; Ozturk E; Ozcinar B; Aribal E; Ozmen V
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(4):1693-7. PubMed ID: 24641392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Blinded double reading yields a higher programme sensitivity than non-blinded double reading at digital screening mammography: a prospected population based study in the south of The Netherlands.
Klompenhouwer EG; Voogd AC; den Heeten GJ; Strobbe LJ; de Haan AF; Wauters CA; Broeders MJ; Duijm LE
Eur J Cancer; 2015 Feb; 51(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 25573788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
