These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8935473)

  • 1. Evidence for the sensitivity of the SF-36 health status measure to inequalities in health: results from the Oxford healthy lifestyles survey.
    Jenkinson C; Layte R; Coulter A; Wright L
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1996 Jun; 50(3):377-80. PubMed ID: 8935473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Criterion validity and reliability of the SF-36 in a population sample.
    Jenkinson C; Wright L; Coulter A
    Qual Life Res; 1994 Feb; 3(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 8142947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age.
    Jenkinson C; Coulter A; Wright L
    BMJ; 1993 May; 306(6890):1437-40. PubMed ID: 8518639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of the SF-36 version 2 in the United Kingdom.
    Jenkinson C; Stewart-Brown S; Petersen S; Paice C
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1999 Jan; 53(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 10326053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey questionnaire: which normative data should be used? Comparisons between the norms provided by the Omnibus Survey in Britain, the Health Survey for England and the Oxford Healthy Life Survey.
    Bowling A; Bond M; Jenkinson C; Lamping DL
    J Public Health Med; 1999 Sep; 21(3):255-70. PubMed ID: 10528952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The short form 36 health status questionnaire: clues from the Oxford region's normative data about its usefulness in measuring health gain in population surveys.
    Ziebland S
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1995 Feb; 49(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 7706993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The new UK National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification (NS-SEC); investigating social class differences in self-reported health status.
    Chandola T; Jenkinson C
    J Public Health Med; 2000 Jun; 22(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 10912557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The SF-36 physical and mental health summary measures: an example of how to interpret scores.
    Jenkinson C
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 1998 Apr; 3(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 10180668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care.
    Brazier JE; Harper R; Jones NM; O'Cathain A; Thomas KJ; Usherwood T; Westlake L
    BMJ; 1992 Jul; 305(6846):160-4. PubMed ID: 1285753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the Dartmouth COOP charts in a large-scale community survey in the United Kingdom.
    Jenkinson C; Mayou R; Day A; Garratt A; Juszczak E
    J Public Health Med; 2002 Jun; 24(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 12141578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An assessment of the construct validity of the SF-12 summary scores across ethnic groups.
    Jenkinson C; Chandola T; Coulter A; Bruster S
    J Public Health Med; 2001 Sep; 23(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 11585190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring change over time: a comparison of results from a global single item of health status and the multi-dimensional SF-36 health status survey questionnaire in patients presenting with menorrhagia.
    Jenkinson C; Peto V; Coulter A
    Qual Life Res; 1994 Oct; 3(5):317-21. PubMed ID: 7841965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and testing of the UK SF-12 (short form health survey).
    Jenkinson C; Layte R
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 1997 Jan; 2(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 10180648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Emotional health problems are the most important cause of disability in adults of working age: a study in the four counties of the old Oxford region.
    Stewart-Brown S; Layte R
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1997 Dec; 51(6):672-5. PubMed ID: 9519131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery.
    Dawson J; Fitzpatrick R; Murray D; Carr A
    Qual Health Care; 1996 Jun; 5(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 10158596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring health status with the SF-36: the need for regional norms.
    Lyons RA; Fielder H; Littlepage BN
    J Public Health Med; 1995 Mar; 17(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 7786567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using the SF-36 with older adults: a cross-sectional community-based survey.
    Walters SJ; Munro JF; Brazier JE
    Age Ageing; 2001 Jul; 30(4):337-43. PubMed ID: 11509313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Making sense of ambiguity: evaluation in internal reliability and face validity of the SF 36 questionnaire in women presenting with menorrhagia.
    Jenkinson C; Peto V; Coulter A
    Qual Health Care; 1996 Mar; 5(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 10157276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of the Short Form-36 to detect the influence of upper gastrointestinal disease on self-reported health status.
    Mant JW; Jenkinson C; Murphy MF; Clipsham K; Marshall P; Vessey MP
    Qual Life Res; 1998 Apr; 7(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 9584552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The SF-36 health survey: a valid measure of changes in health status after injury.
    Kopjar B
    Inj Prev; 1996 Jun; 2(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 9346078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.