These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8935969)

  • 1. Estimation of breast radiation dose in a mammographic system.
    Lee KH; Kandaiya S
    Appl Radiat Isot; 1996 Mar; 47(3):361-3. PubMed ID: 8935969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammography of a phantom and breast tissue with synchrotron radiation and a linear-array silicon detector.
    Arfelli F; Bonvicini V; Bravin A; Cantatore G; Castelli E; Dalla Palma L; Di Michiel M; Longo R; Olivo A; Pani S; Pontoni D; Poropat P; Prest M; Rashevsky A; Tromba G; Vacchi A
    Radiology; 1998 Sep; 208(3):709-15. PubMed ID: 9722850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The leakage radiation testing method for mammographic X-ray equipments].
    Xia LJ; Wang JJ; Dupont B; Chen J
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 30(2):129-30. PubMed ID: 16830808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Monte Carlo study of the energy dependence of Al2O3:C crystals for real-time in vivo dosimetry in mammography.
    Aznar MC; Medin J; Hemdal B; Thilander Klang A; Bøtter-Jensen L; Mattsson S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):444-9. PubMed ID: 15933153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Further factors for the estimation of mean glandular dose using the United Kingdom, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols.
    Dance DR; Young KC; van Engen RE
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(14):4361-72. PubMed ID: 19550001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammography dosimetry using an in-house developed polymethyl methacrylate phantom.
    Sharma R; Sharma SD; Mayya YS; Chourasiya G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 22232773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of scatter reduction method and monochromatic beams on image quality and dose in mammography.
    Moeckli R; Verdun FR; Fiedler S; Pachoud M; Bulling S; Schnyder P; Valley JF
    Med Phys; 2003 Dec; 30(12):3156-64. PubMed ID: 14713082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CdZnTe detector in mammographic x-ray spectroscopy.
    Miyajima S; Imagawa K
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Nov; 47(22):3959-72. PubMed ID: 12476976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system.
    Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Dance DR
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dedicated phantom and TLD-100 dosimetry for simultaneous determination of mean glandular dose and beam quality: Proposal for a compact mammography quality control procedure.
    Sánchez-Nieto B; López-Pineda E; Ruiz-Trejo C; Muñoz ID; Caprile P; Chorbadjian G; Brandan ME
    Phys Med; 2019 Apr; 60():30-36. PubMed ID: 31000083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A high-resolution voxel phantom of the breast for dose calculations in mammography.
    Hoeschen C; Fill U; Zankl M; Panzer W; Regulla D; Döhring W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):406-9. PubMed ID: 15933147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of exposure in mammography: limitations of average glandular dose and proposal of a new quantity.
    Geeraert N; Klausz R; Muller S; Bloch I; Bosmans H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):342-5. PubMed ID: 25897143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Experiences with phantom measurements in different mammographic systems].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Lell M; Kuchar I; Bautz W
    Rofo; 2002 Oct; 174(10):1243-6. PubMed ID: 12375196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Mammography -a guidance level and the present situation of mammographic dose-].
    Terada H
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(2):65-73. PubMed ID: 12766282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast dosimetry using high-resolution voxel phantoms.
    Dance DR; Hunt RA; Bakic PR; Maidment AD; Sandborg M; Ullman G; Alm Carlsson G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):359-63. PubMed ID: 15933137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between phantom failure rates and radiation dose in mammography accreditation.
    Haus AG; Yaffe MJ; Feig SA; Hendrick RE; Butler PA; Wilcox PA; Bansal S
    Med Phys; 2001 Nov; 28(11):2297-301. PubMed ID: 11764036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The notes of the measuring average glandular dose].
    Kumagai M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Mar; 58(3):348-54. PubMed ID: 12522341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The performance of commercial photodiodes for dosimetry in mammography.
    Batista E; Khoury HJ; Melo FA; Barros V; da Silva EF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):391-3. PubMed ID: 16381752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast Radiation Dose With CESM Compared With 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis Mammography.
    James JR; Pavlicek W; Hanson JA; Boltz TF; Patel BK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):362-372. PubMed ID: 28112559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Calibration of dosemeters used in mammography with different X ray qualities: EUROMET project no. 526.
    Witzani J; Bjerke H; Bochud F; Csete I; Denoziere M; de Vries W; Ennow K; Grindborg JE; Hourdakis C; Kosunen A; Kramer HM; Pernick F; Sander T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 108(1):33-45. PubMed ID: 14974603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.