These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. [Conflicting expert opinions from the legal viewpoint]. Pelz FJ Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):636-9. PubMed ID: 9064938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Medico-legal opinionating and its importance in the light of legal requirements]. GÅ‚azek A Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2007; 57(2):184-8. PubMed ID: 17691172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Payment for reports by the assistance service]. Rieger HJ Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1988 Dec; 113(49):1935-7. PubMed ID: 2973976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Withholding, seducing, and threatening: a pilot study of further attorney pressures on expert witnesses. Gutheil TG; Commons M; Miller PM J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 11592463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Medical opinions in court--a challenge for communication between physicians and lawyers]. Dierks Ch Versicherungsmedizin; 2005 Mar; 57(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 15759811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Criteria of expert assessment of professional errors in dentistry]. Popova TG Sud Med Ekspert; 2007; 50(6):25-7. PubMed ID: 18159756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Attorneys' requests for complete tax records from opposing expert witnesses: some approaches to the problem. Gutheil TG; Simon RI; Simpson S J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):518-22. PubMed ID: 17185482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [The importance of documentation in emergency medicine]. Schiffner H Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1989; 83(13):675-6. PubMed ID: 2789455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Failure to document may favor the patient in proof of malpractice]. Thiede A; Zimmermann HJ Zentralbl Chir; 2011 Feb; 136(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 21351050 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Medical expert assessment in civil and criminal law--stand for evaluating medical expert assessment]. Kienzle HF Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):592-6. PubMed ID: 9064929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [References for expert testimony: MDK--speaking the same language with the expert witness]. Schaupeter R Pflege Z; 2002 May; 55(5):365-6. PubMed ID: 12046214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Doctors vs. doctors. Friedman JH Med Health R I; 2004 Nov; 87(11):326-7. PubMed ID: 15631295 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Expert medical testimony is generally required to prove medical negligence. McCarter WD; Hayek TJ Mo Med; 2001 Oct; 98(10):488-9. PubMed ID: 11668860 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Lawyers and physicians. Professional responsibility. Kaul RH J Kans Med Soc; 1968 Aug; 69(8):371-5. PubMed ID: 5667830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Appointment with death. Kalstrom J Minn Med; 1998 Nov; 81(11):14-21. PubMed ID: 9842230 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The right to a fair trial: the MSMA expert medical witness reform bill of 2006. Gale AH Mo Med; 2006; 103(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 16579296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Medical/legal interprofessional code. J La State Med Soc; 1995 Mar; 147(3):89-95. PubMed ID: 7722406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]