These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8937659)

  • 21. [Cochlear implant for non-deaf patients?].
    Müller-Deile J; Rudert H; Brademann G; Frese K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Mar; 77(3):136-43. PubMed ID: 9577819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. U.S. Phase I preliminary results of use of the Otologics MET Fully-Implantable Ossicular Stimulator.
    Jenkins HA; Atkins JS; Horlbeck D; Hoffer ME; Balough B; Arigo JV; Alexiades G; Garvis W
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Aug; 137(2):206-12. PubMed ID: 17666242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Rehabilitation of high-frequency hearing loss with the RetroX auditory implant.
    Garin P; Genard F; Galle C; Fameree MH; Jamart J; Gersdorff M
    B-ENT; 2005; 1(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 15999671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [First implantation of a totally implantable electronic hearing aid in patients with inner ear hearing loss].
    Zenner HP; Maassen MM; Plinkert PK; Zimmermann R; Baumann JW; Reischl G; Leysieffer H
    HNO; 1998 Oct; 46(10):844-52. PubMed ID: 9846264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical outcomes for adult cochlear implant recipients experiencing loss of usable acoustic hearing in the implanted ear.
    Plant KL; van Hoesel RJ; McDermott HJ; Dawson PW; Cowan RS
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):338-56. PubMed ID: 25474417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Phase III results with a totally implantable piezoelectric middle ear implant: speech audiometry, spatial hearing and psychosocial adjustment.
    Zenner HP; Limberger A; Baumann JW; Reischl G; Zalaman IM; Mauz PS; Sweetow RW; Plinkert PK; Zimmermann R; Baumann I; De Maddalena H; Leysieffer H; Maassen MM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Mar; 124(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 15072417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reliability of monosyllabic discrimination tests in white noise for differentiating among hearing aids.
    Beattie RC; Edgerton BJ
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1976 Nov; 41(4):464-76. PubMed ID: 994477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [The age effect in evaluation of hearing aid benefits by speech audiometry].
    Müller A; Hocke T; Hoppe U; Mir-Salim P
    HNO; 2016 Mar; 64(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 26801889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Our auditory results using the Vibrant Soundbridge on the long process of the incus: 20 years of data.
    Grégoire A; Van Damme JP; Gilain C; Bihin B; Garin P
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Feb; 45(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 28285827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Right Ear Advantage of Speech Audiometry in Single-sided Deafness.
    Wettstein VG; Probst R
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Apr; 39(4):417-421. PubMed ID: 29533329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Evaluation of the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test in background noise].
    Löhler J; Akcicek B; Pilnik M; Saager-Post K; Dazert S; Biedron S; Oeken J; Mürbe D; Löbert J; Laszig R; Wesarg T; Langer C; Plontke S; Rahne T; Machate U; Noppeney R; Schultz K; Plinkert P; Hoth S; Praetorius M; Schlattmann P; Meister EF; Pau HW; Ehrt K; Hagen R; Shehata-Dieler W; Cebulla M; Walther LE; Ernst A
    HNO; 2013 Jul; 61(7):586-91. PubMed ID: 23076435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of 2 implantable bone conduction devices in patients with single-sided deafness using a daily alternating method.
    Desmet JB; Wouters K; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):1018-26. PubMed ID: 22772008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Speech audiometry for indication of conventional and implantable hearing aids].
    Hoppe U; Hast A
    HNO; 2017 Mar; 65(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 27921115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speech discrimination with an 8-channel compression hearing aid and conventional aids in background of speech-band noise.
    Yund EW; Simon HJ; Efron R
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):161-80. PubMed ID: 3430375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Audiological application criteria for implantable hearing aid devices: a clinical experience at the Nijmegen ORL clinic.
    Verhaegen VJ; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW; Snik AF
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1645-9. PubMed ID: 18677283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Acoustic reflex threshold measurement in hearing aid selection.
    Rappaport BZ; Tait CA
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1976 Mar; 102(3):129-32. PubMed ID: 1267684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [A micromanipulator for intraoperative vibratory hearing assessment with an implantable hearing aid transducer].
    Lehner R; Maassen MM; Leysieffer H; Zenner HP
    HNO; 1998 May; 46(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 9647922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Bone-anchored hearing aids BAHA: 10 years' experience].
    Portmann D; Boudard P; Vdovytsya O
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2001 Aug; 102(5):274-7. PubMed ID: 11599150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.